Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2013, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 7 Oct 2013 17:49:25 -0600
Reply-To:     Richard A Jones <Jones@COLORADO.EDU>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Richard A Jones <Jones@COLORADO.EDU>
Subject:      Re: 2.2 into a 1.9 case
In-Reply-To:  <52531461.46892b0a.4e9a.ffffb243SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

> VW's own waterboxer overhaul program in Canada > ended miserably with an overall failure rate of close to 50%.

I put a Canadian rebuilt 2.0 air-cooled in my '81 at just over 100K miles. It was a better engine than the original from Germany. That is, it seemed stronger and more powerful. Well, it was still a 2.0 in a Vanagon. ;-)

Richard


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.