Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2013, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 2 Nov 2013 08:34:54 -0500
Reply-To:     Jim Felder <jim.felder@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jim Felder <jim.felder@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Propex alternative?
In-Reply-To:  <20131101213509.OC8LO.161795.imail@eastrmwml107>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I have spent nearly a hundred nights camped with an Olympian Wave 3 catalytic heater and have no reason to expect that I will not survive many more. It's flat and about the size of a sheet of paper. It mounts to a wall. It plumbs in to to the propane tank or uses a screw on cannister. It is renown for how little fuel it uses and therefore how little oxygen it consumes. I crack a window, but that's kind of a superstition since the poptop canvas passes much more air than a cracked window would.

They are pricier than the ones you find in camping and home stores but they use a lot less fuel.

When I camp during cold weather (less than 20 degrees, say) I can take my 40 degree bags instead of the bigger ones. It saves a lot of space.

Jim

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Dave Mcneely <mcneely4@cox.net> wrote:

> Presence of CO and too little O-2 are separate (though ultimately related) > matters when it comes to breathing in a confined space with a space heater. > First, the device consumes oxygen, making less available for the living > beings in the same space. That in itself is problematic, as you mentioned > ("running out of oxygen is kinda bad"). But it is generally only after the > oxygen is depleted somewhat that CO rears its head, due to incomplete > combustion of fuel at the burner. This is beyond "running out of oxygen." > The CO itself is toxic. Generally, before things get to this level, the > living beings in the space are already at least groggy from low oxygen > levels, and so are not very able to do anything about the high CO level. > That is especially so if they sleep with the heater operating. > > It may be that you have been providing ample ventilation, and thus the > device has been burning the fuel completely or nearly so. > > I opt for no unvented heater in my living space, though of course I do use > the cooking stove, with at least a window cracked open an inch or so, when > I am up and about. > > Down bags and warm clothing are wonderful for sleeping and daytime > activity respectfully. I do not sleep with dogs, though I usually do let > sleeping dogs lie. I do sleep with another person, though with maturity we > have found that each to his and her separate bag allows better sleep > conditions than a more intimate arrangement would. > > mcneely > > ---- tom ring <taring@TARING.ORG> wrote: > > One thing I learned during my heating experiments in the last 2 weeks is > that > > my Coleman catalytic produces 0 CO (on the digi display) as monitored by > the CO > > alarm I have in the van. I know it works as the engine can set it off > when I > > have the engine cover off when I'm working on it and it's running. > > > > I was quite happy to discover that. It's still a very good idea to have > decent > > ventilation when using one as running out of oxygen is kinda bad. > > > > tom > > > > On 30 Oct 2013 at 23:40, Karl Mullendore wrote: > > > > > This question comes up every year. Three basic options (well, truly > safe > > > options), from low to high in price, with my observations: > > > 1) Atwood, been around forever, 75% efficiency = 9000 btu. Probably > find one > > > for $300-400. Does the job but doesn't fit so well in the stock Westy > cabinets > > > 2) Propex, been around a long time also, and continuously improved, 93% > > > efficiency = 6500/9700 btu depending on model. Half or less of the > physical > > > size of the Atwood. $735-840. > > > 3) Espar and Webasto gas/diesel heaters - well established design, > multiple > > > speeds and heater levels, efficiency good, half the size of a Propex, > but > > > 1.5 to 2 times the price. Yearly maintenance required, which the > propane > > > heaters usually do not. > > > I've had vans with all of the above and all served the purpose. My > favorite > > > is the Espar diesel version as I usually install these in my personal > diesel > > > Syncros. > > > What I wouldn't use is a catalytic or other non-vented heater. > Sleeping bags > > > are much cheaper. I'd sooner build a tiny wood stove. :-) > > > Karl > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > Tom Ring K0TAR EN34hx > > > > Never attribute to engineers that into which politicians, lawyers, > > accountants, and marketeers have poked their fingers. > > ----------------------------------------- > > -- > David McNeely >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.