Date:         Mon, 9 Dec 2013 18:48:14 -0500
Reply-To:     Derek Burgess <ddb.graphic@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Derek Burgess <ddb.graphic@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Multi Meter
In-Reply-To:  <BAY404-EAS1014B782CD113CF95F38AE9A0D30@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I love my Fluke 115 - Has great light, big display, bar graph,
averaging(great for O2), plus solid construction and Fluke reputation.  It
ran me $150 on Amazon some years ago, but I had already spend $80 on cheap
meters that were inaccurate and functionless.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000OCFFMW/ref=oh_details_o02_s00_i00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

-Derek
1990 GL Automatic "Vikki"


On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@hotmail.com>wrote:

> I know I'm late in responding. There are some things that need a meter more
> responsive than on old swing meter but here are some features you should
> have.
> Certain functions such as the O2 sensor circuit do work quickly. You want a
> meter that includes a bar graph as part of the display.
> You want duty cycle and frequency.
> A lighted display.
>
> There are many meters available with these features at reasonable prices.
> Just do your homework.
>
> Dennis
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of
> JRodgers
> Sent: Sunday, December 8, 2013 6:39 AM
> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> Subject: Multi Meter
>
> Time I guess to step into the modern world, and upgrade from my 40 year old
> analog multimeter to one of newer digital types.
>
> Soliciting recommends for a new meter - best bang for the buck.
>
> Any input appreciated much.,
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>