Date:         Wed, 25 Dec 2013 14:46:07 -0500
Reply-To:     Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Tire observation
Comments: To: Don Hanson <dhanson928@GMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <CAHTkEuJbc7boaY04CfnVnKjuMqXmS7oDzYA1ShhpW5U=Mqb3vw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

In general a low traction-rolling resistance tire will also require less
steering effort. The two attributes do work together. There are exceptions
especially with the change to higher performance low profile tires. Here
they can increase traction and handling and also reduce rolling resistance.
However wider tires can still increase steering effort.  The Vanagon is
probably amongst the last breed of vehicle available without power steering.


Dennis


-----Original Message-----
From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of
Don Hanson
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2013 1:05 PM
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
Subject: Tire observation

I recently swapped my 14" tires.  I put my older Nokian Hakkapelitta C mud
and snow on the front, replacing Hankook RAO 8s that were even more worn
than the hakkas.  This greatly increased the effort to steer at parking
speeds.  I have no power steering.  I have decent arm strength, but I now
find it quite a chore to turn the wheels without any movement of the van,
where with the RAO 8s, it was much easier.  I have about 43psi (dunno how
many Barrs that is) in the tires.  Once rolling and at higher speeds, the
Hakkas steer and track just fine.