Everybody should have this "problem". Two more watts isn't going to melt anything. Brighter = better. Good upgrade, as far as it goes. Larry A.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:16 PM, David Bjorkman <ddbjorkman@verizon.net>wrote: > I can't believe I am having a problem with this. I tried to find a > replacement for the rear tail light (running, not brake/turn signal) in my > "87 Westy. I went to the local FLAPS and NAPA and no one had the bulb. I > thought this was going to be simple. I ended up getting a couple of # 67 > bulbs (in desperation) which are 7W bulbs, as opposed to the 5W which are > supposed to be in there. > Anyone else have this problem or a solution where I can find the correct > bulb. Is it OK to use the # 67's? I suppose I wouldn't mind a brighter > running light back there. > > Dave B. > |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.