Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2014, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 6 Jun 2014 10:34:30 -0700
Reply-To:     Don Hanson <dhanson928@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Don Hanson <dhanson928@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: OT Fri. more on my Poor Man's Syncro (Astro/Safari) a sort of
              review..long
Comments: To: Stuart MacMillan <stuartmacm@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <000601cf81a8$d82d9af0$8888d0d0$@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

From what I understand, reading up on these, GM made the mistake by stopping production on these...The Safari/Astro vans were doing damage to sales from other GM models is the word, and looking a bit outdated to management and to the bean counters. With the cost of fuel rising nobody was buying full size Chevy vans or SUVs where GM could make a bigger per unit profit, when they could get smaller ones that carried the weight, lasted in fleet service and got slightly better gas mileage....If you want to pay attention, you will observe in most any city there are tons of these little vans everywhere, still in use by tradesmen and delivery services even though they quit making them over ten years ago...

I have seen mention of a diesel engine swap...haven't read that far yet...if common wisdom is correct I won't have to worry about the motor for another 200k miles on this one I have, but when that happens I will certainly look at diesels..A crate motor from JEGS for these is about $2k...long block..

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Stuart MacMillan <stuartmacm@gmail.com> wrote:

> Starting in the '90s NHSTA required front end energy absorbing crumple > zones in all US vehicles, which is why you won't see a rear engined vehicle > sold here again. The body is designed so the engine is forced down and > under in a frontal impact and its mass absorbs some of the force of the > crash, protecting the cockpit. Combine that with a bunch of airbags and > you've got a much safer vehicle. We Vanagon owners like to live on the > edge though! > > These are nice, practical vans, but are trucks like you said, and they > couldn't compete with the more refined family minivans from other > manufacturers. GM could have refined them (and not just by adding leather > seats) but opted not to . But then, GM has made a lot of mistakes . . . > > Stuart > > -----Original Message----- > > ..... I noticed the front end is more like a normal car...it sticks out > there > further than a Vanagon's. > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.