Date:         Sun, 1 Jun 2014 05:38:46 -0700
Reply-To:     Don Hanson <dhanson928@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Don Hanson <dhanson928@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Poor Man's Syncro...Friday OT..Safari AWD (a bit long)
Comments: To: James <jk_eaton@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <BLU177-W35E1FC93BA5762C0B2CAF2E0210@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

  My 'cheaper' comment is about the actual real cost difference, not
perceived the quality.

 I have not seen many AWD syncro Westies for under $20k recently, and many
of them are selling for double and triple that...Regular 2wds are also way
more than double or triple what these GM vans seem to be selling for, so
far. (they seem to be worth lots more in Europe)

  You are correct that the GM vans cost less...dunno about cheaper,
quality-wise...I'd certainly match the Vortec v-6 motor against any wbx
motor for durability and power..the Safari I got (97)  still has the
syncro-style full time viscous coupling drive line, but the later ones are
computer controlled, said to be a big improvement...and of course the parts
are cheap and plentiful for these 'less elete' GM vans...I should have said
it that way..."Blue Collar campervans" maybe.


On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 8:17 PM, James <jk_eaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
While I prefer the Westfalia version, "Cheap VW imitations" is unfair when
it comes to Astro Condo camper van conversions - had a chance to go through
several of these on our travels last summer, and the Quebec company doing
the conversions has achieved a very Teutonic level of planning, quality,
and execution in their camper conversions.  The van underneath is cheaper -
certainly it rides rougher - but then it tows 5000 pounds!

James