Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2014, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 11 Jun 2014 08:41:42 -0600
Reply-To:     Gnarlodious <gnarlodious@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Gnarlodious <gnarlodious@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: I rather drive the Vanagon
In-Reply-To:  <20140611102459.653Y9.350333.imail@eastrmwml301>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I hate to be the one to say this but I think it is mostly a matter of technique. A smooth gentle torque gets you maximum friction whereas spinning your tires mindlessly ruins your traction for good.

I see this all the time with people stuck on packed snow, mud/clay or sand. They tromp on the pedal and get lots of spinning but no traction. Once you get that surface glazed your tires are just sliding on a tiny surface. Horsepower is the enemy of traction.

As usual, to comes down to the laws of physics. Like I said, I have never gotten stuck. My towing loops have never been used, except to pull others out.

-- Gnarlie

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Dave Mcneely <mcneely4@cox.net> wrote:

> For what it's worth, I haven't had a problem -- I have been stuck with my > camper one time. That was on slick, wet clay road, not deep mud, but I was > able to extricate myself ok by using the driving tricks my father taught me > 55 years ago. I do drive into the back in it with my (2WD) Volkswagen > Vanagon GL Campmobile with 2.1 engine and 4 speed manual transmission. The > tires are Kumho 857s, which are NOT trailer tires, being sold the world > over by Kumho as "van and transporter tires." Oh, Scott, it is tan. Sand, > mud, and very rocky roads have not been a problem for me with the vehicle. > Of course, what do I know? mcneely > > ---- Don Hanson <dhanson928@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > > All Westies except the beetle....hmmm...maybe I should put in the rear > > closet and the second story balcony into my tin top... > > > > On not making it over rocks....I do ok with that on my stock 14" steel > > wheels, as long as I keep up a good pace and don't stop on anything > > slippery when pointed uphill...or anything deep and soft on the level... > I > > can drive around the lack of traction but I have to be more careful than > in > > most other vehicles I have owned.... > > > > A Vanagon should not be called "ok for traction" when it's often spinning > > it's wheels on wet grass lawns that are very slightly uphill, right? > > Worse in reverse, but even in my almost compound low first gear 5sp and > > super careful clutch modulation, unless I have ballast in the way > back...it > > is likely to just sit there with one wheel turning.. My uphill > driveway > > in the snow is as exciting to try to negotiate as a lap of Willow Springs > > racetrack was in my Porsche race car....You gotta balance speed with > > control and catch the rear end all the way up while feathering the > throttle > > and trying to conserve as much speed as possible....I often crest at > about > > 1mph with the revs going up and down as I try to re-gain traction... > > > > I too have had lots of Volkswagens and most were outstanding for > > traction...not the vanagon. > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:55 PM, OlRivrRat <OlRivrRat@comcast.net> > wrote: > > > > > I find this conversation to be quite interesting ~ I have only > had > > > 4 RearEng' Vehicles in my 54Yrs of driving ~ a 73SuperBeatle ~ a > 76Westy ~ > > > an 83.5Westy ~ a 90Westy ~ All were 2(1)wd & I can Honestly say that I > > > never ever felt like they were TractionChallenged & I took all 4 of > those > > > Vehicles to many places in NM, CO, UT that a lot of folks would not > even > > > dream any StreetVehicle could go ~ I did always run BFG > AllTerrainRadial > > > 27x8.50 14s on the Rear of the 76 & 83.5 Westys & up until a Couple of > Yrs > > > ago the 90 wore CooperBuilt Dominator 235/75r15 on the Rear~ > > > > > > > > > ORR ~ DeanB > > > > > > On 10 Jun , 2014, at 6:47 PM, Vanagon wrote: > > > > > > > "You would be hard pressed though to find another vehicle with these > > > weight characteristics to have a 185 width tire that is then inflated > to a > > > point of limited contact patch." > > > > > > > > When I told my son about the rough time my van had when pulling up a > > > fairly rough and steep dirt/rubble road a couple weeks ago - with > trailer > > > filled with camping gear in tow, he, who four-wheels with friends and > > > drives a Jeep Cherokee with mighty burly tires, said, "yeah, those > little > > > tires probably have a hard time climbing over even small rocks." > > > > > > > > Kind of like trying to ride over a garden hose on a skateboard. > > > > > > > > Sent from my 1963 aqua 702B Western Electric Princess phone. > > > > > > > >> On Jun 9, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM > > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Many rear wheel drive vehicles have more weight up front than at the > > > rear and the vanagon is not always front heavy. You would be hard > pressed > > > though to find another vehicle with these weight characteristics to > have a > > > 185 width tire that is then inflated to a point of limited contact > patch. > > > >> > > > >> Dennis > > > >> > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On > > > Behalf Of SDF ( aka ;jim lahey' - Scott ) > > > >> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 2:35 AM > > > >> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > > > >> Subject: Re: I rather drive the Vanagon > > > >> > > > >> look up the weight distribution for a 2WD vanagon .. > > > >> oddly, amazingly ..their is more weight on the front axle than on > the > > > rear ( drive ) axle !! > > > >> > > > >> which why they are traction-challenged. > > > >>> On 6/8/2014 3:18 PM, Dennis Haynes wrote: > > > >>> While the Hakka's are very good tire quality wise and that tire has > > > some winter capability you simply will not get much traction on a > 185/80 > > > tire inflated to 50 psi or more. If you want to make any improvements > you > > > need to begin where the rubber meets the road. > > > >>> > > > >>> Dennis > > > >>> > > > >>> -----Original Message----- > > > >>> From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On > > > >>> Behalf Of Don Hanson > > > >>> Sent: Saturday, June 7, 2014 11:36 PM > > > >>> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > > > >>> Subject: Re: I rather drive the Vanagon > > > >>> > > > >>> You haven't tried enough. > > > >>> > > > >>> Well, nice discussion but it doesn't alter the way 2wd Vanagons > > > normally > > > >>> behave. They just are not as good, traction-wise, as many other > > > >>> vehicles.. On a scale of 1 to 10 I would rate mine about a > 3..maybe a > > > two. > > > >>> I had a long bed 2wd ford pickup that was awful in snow...I'd give > > > >>> that a > > > >>> 3 maybe 4..... Oh, I've made lots of improvements trying to make > mine > > > go better but it still gets stuck without much effort, if you are not > > > really careful about how you ask it to move.... If I park on any kind > of > > > slick or soft surface that has any slope...I better park headed > downhill, > > > or I am > > > >>> stuck. If I stop in sand...stuck. If I have the front wheels > > > turned in > > > >>> sand and try to move...stuck. If it snows while I am away from my > > > >>> house....I am stuck at the bottom of my driveway... > > > >>> > > > >>> This is with brand new Nokian Hakkapellita mud and snows on the > rear, > > > the suspension reworked and the van corner balanced and many years of > snow > > > and sand driving experience...They just plain don't work that well..You > > > *can* drive around this crummy traction, most of the time, but I think > it > > > is one of the few things my Vanagon does badly.... > > > >>> > > > >>> Yes, a limited slip diff would be a huge improvement...Or better > > > yet, a full locker for when you need it... > > > >>> > > > >>> I think it is partly due to the rear suspension not being > > > particularly supple or having very much travel...It doesn't take much > to > > > get a wheel completely off the ground at the rear...there is little > "droop" > > > in the Vanagon...Droop being the amount a suspension will hang down > when > > > the vehicle is lifted.... > > > >>> > > > >>> When it begins to snow and sleet around here I have to load at > least > > > a few hundred lbs onto the rear deck lid to keep driving my vanagon > without > > > being constantly stuck...that's not very convenient nor safe and it is > a > > > real pain when you need to access the engine.. > > > >>> > > > > > -- > David McNeely >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.