Date:         Sat, 5 Jul 2014 12:26:23 -0400
Reply-To:     David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Subject:      Re: End of Draft: Analog VOMs for vans, was Re: AFM test readings
Comments: To: Harold Teer <teer.vanagon@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <CAGwfHKRb4bJ2V8=6DS3VF23zJdu+zMJmbqvKeuNQS04PVpDfEg@mail.g
              mail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed

Hi Harold,

At 09:04 AM 7/5/2014, Harold Teer wrote:
>Thanks so much for taking the time to put this 
>double posting together. Â I feel bad that my 
>question regarding AFM testing caused you to 
>spend so much time working on this but this ended up being a great resource.

Harold, I'm grateful to you and Mr. Squirrel 
both.  That was not how I planned to spend my 
night, but I think it was a good deal more 
productive than anything else I would have 
done.  Regardless, I wouldn't have done some 
things I *should* have been doing, but I think 
this was a more than worthwhile substitute.  And 
I'm tickled pink that my jaded belief that it was 
coherent isn't turning out wrong.

And I must have thought of a hundred things I 
left out, along with shoving it into a slightly 
fancier editor than Eudora and actually 
formatting it a little bit.  With a bit of effort 
I think it could be ready to put in the wiki and 
be a solid resource for some time to come.  I've 
been well paid for my night's work.

Best,
David