Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:43:47 -0400
Reply-To: Tom Buese <tantonbz@GMAIL.COM>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: Tom Buese <tantonbz@GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: Replacement fuel tank question
In-Reply-To: <085c01cfa55a$559b3b30$00d1b190$@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
My 1990 syncro doka has an 18+- gallon gas tank, but i have been able to
put 18.7 gallons in it, which means I was completely out of gas when I
pulled into the station, or the pump lied!
That said when filling the tank, the pump shutoff usually stops pumping at
about 13-14 gallons, & then I nurse it to top off the tank/filler neck w/
the above claimed gallonage.
YMMV,
Mr. BZ-fuel pump still works well, so tank must be clean?
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Stuart MacMillan <stuartmacm@gmail.com>
wrote:
> That was a joke. But, if you are filling with 14 gallons, you have 1.6
> gallons left, or 27.2 miles. Helpful if you know the distance to the next
> gas station down the road.
>
> Stuart
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike B [mailto:mbucchino@charter.net]
> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 7:29 PM
> To: Stuart MacMillan; vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> Subject: Re: Replacement fuel tank question
>
> I would never run it until it's nearly empty just to get more miles, so
> I still only get 225 miles between fill-ups at the same red area on the
> gas gauge. If you want to risk running out of gas and/or and ruining
> your expensive fuel pump, that's up to you. I don't risk either.
>
> Mike B.
>
> On 7/21/2014 8:11 PM, Stuart MacMillan wrote:
> > Not quite, the tank is 15.6 gallons. I get 17 on the highway, 265 miles
> if
> > I coast into the filling station.
> >
> > Stuart
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > Michael
> > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 3:46 PM
> > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> > Subject: Re: Replacement fuel tank question
> >
> > My 87 Westy is getting 16mpg with a 14 gallon tank so I'm getting less
> range
> > than you thought was ridiculous on your motor home!
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On Jul 21, 2014, at 18:12, Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Not only the NHTSA but also EPA or other compliance issues. The
> >> vehicle and the emission control system including the vapor recovery
> >> is designed for that size tank. Back in 1998 I tried to upgrade the
> >> tank on my 1992 Ford
> >> E-350 based motorhome. It had a 35 gallon tank and at 7 to 7.5 mpg
> >> gallon the range was ridiculous. A 55 gallon tank was an option from
> >> the factory so I ordered the tank and related parts from the dealer.
> >> When I went to pick the stuff up I had to provide the VIN. Sale denied!
> >>
> >> Dennis
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On
> >> Behalf Of Stuart MacMillan
> >> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 8:28 PM
> >> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> >> Subject: Re: Replacement fuel tank question
> >>
> >> I suspect that fuel tanks have to pass NHTSA testing as done by the
> >> manufacturer in their vehicle crash tests, which is why VW didn't
> >> change the design two years into production. No aftermarket supplier
> >> is going to take on this liability either.
> >>
> >> Stuart
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Roy Nicholl [mailto:RNicholl@NBNET.NB.CA]
> >> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 5:20 PM
> >> To: Stuart MacMillan
> >> Cc: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> >> Subject: Re: Replacement fuel tank question
> >>
> >>
> >> I find it strange that the aftermarket providers who continue to
> >> manufacture fuel tanks for these vehicles continued to keep the "saddle"
> > in their
> >> construction. A few quick measurements of the tank dropped from the
> '88
> >> indicates one could expect 14-18 additional litres of fuel if they
> >> were not there and the tank would be simpler to manufacture.
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 20-Jul-2014, at 20:50, Stuart MacMillan wrote:
> >>>
> >>> No, and blame Volkswagen for introducing the vanagon with the
> >>> obsolete air cooled engine. Was not worth it for them to re-tool for
> >>> a couple more gallons of gas.
> >>>
> >>> Stuart
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On
> >>> Behalf Of Roy Nicholl
> >>> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 12:28 PM
> >>> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> >>> Subject: Replacement fuel tank question
> >>>
> >>> All,
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone make a replacement fuel tank for the water-cooled Vanagon
> >>> w/o the cavities/moulded passages for the air-cooled heater pipes.
> >>> While I appreciate the needs of the air-heads, I would prefer the
> >>> extra range this capacity could provide if that volume was on the
> >>> inside
> >> of the tank.
>
--
Tom Buese
|