Date:         Mon, 29 Sep 2014 06:46:21 -0700
Reply-To:     Don Hanson <dhanson928@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Don Hanson <dhanson928@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Propex + altitude +placement
Comments: To: ddbjorkman@verizon.net
In-Reply-To:  <16947023.468913.1411995970007.JavaMail.root@vms170027>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Have you thought about somewhere in the engine bay?  My inline has some
room back there, probably easily enough for a heater install..It would help
with traction and it would not be exposed to road mung.

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 6:06 AM, David Bjorkman <ddbjorkman@verizon.net>
wrote:

> Hi All;
>
> I am thinking of going the propex route.  I have 2 questions for those
> more propex knowledgeable than I.
> 1)  I have heard that the propex heaters have some problems with
> altitude.  Their performance, and mayhaps ability to operate, diminish with
> altitude.  Anyone up in the Rockies or another high point able to confirm
> or deny what I have heard?
> 2)  If I go with the installation, I am wondering about placement.  I
> already am unhappy with the loss of my overhead storage space to the A/C
> (which I enjoy, I'm so conflicted) and so do not want to lose anymore
> interior space to the propex.  I do not want to remove the rear hot water
> heat unit so am thinking about the under the floor installation.  Anyone
> have experience with this kind of placement and the rigors of snow, road
> salt, and other hazards that the heater will run into if placed under the
> vehicle and into the elements?
>
> Thanks;
> Dave B.
>  '87 Westy with FAS inline 4
>