Date:         Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:21:50 -0800
Reply-To:     Neil N <musomuso@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Neil N <musomuso@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: WBX 1.9 or 2.1... what would you do?
Comments: To: Dan N <dn92610@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <CAFdLW6kfrOovPQaWXb2+JhLEkQ6UnxAtOBO+DsYx=XEfO7=dyw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I'd determine exactly what work is needed on the 1.9 If limited to top
end (head re-seal? or?) and I knew engine history and miles, I'd take
a gamble on that. I'd also consider condition of ancillary parts,
especially the exhaust system. However. If I found a running 2.1
especially one with a good exhaust system, and I was doing R&R of all
parts concerned, that might be a better bet.

caveat on top end rebuild "gamble": a corroded, snapped and stuck case
stud(s), other studs, alternator bracket mount points at case, will
likely increase the quoted price of rebuild.

Neil.

On 11/3/14, Dan N <dn92610@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi all
>
> a 85' with WBX 1.9 need to be rebuilt or at least the top end rebuilt..
>
> if you have a choice to have the 1.9 rebuilt or swap in for a good used
> 2.1...
>
> for the same price...
>
> what would you do?



--
Neil n

Blog: Vanagons, Westfalia, general <http://tubaneil.blogspot.ca>

1988 Westy Images <https://picasaweb.google.com/musomuso/New1988Westy>

1981 Westfalia "Jaco" Images, technical <http://tubaneil.googlepages.com/>

Vanagon-Bus VAG Gas Engine Swap Group <http://tinyurl.com/khalbay>