Date:         Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:44:34 -0500
Reply-To:     Dean S <predsmaniac@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Dean S <predsmaniac@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Koni shock question
Comments: To: Dan N <dn92610@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <CAFdLW6mPHhRF+awH18zh-7kw8RTas5sk=D_kSm0fijARQ0W_CQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Thanks Dan...I picked up a brand new set (4)at a swap meet for $125.00
total and had the front installed last week...the original front's were
beyond shot...what an improvement the rear Koni's  are stamped with the no.
822101 and are too short.  I know I am ahead of the game on cost but at
this point I am just curious as to why they are too short,yet all offerings
have that no. listed for them.  And yes we pulled em all the way out..the
original's are about 3 inches longer than the Koni's  as we sat them side
by side. Odd that.

Thanks for confirming it.
DS

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Dan N <dn92610@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think so because they are listed at Van Cafe 1084-1985 section...
>
> I had them both Front and Read on my 90 Carat with the stiffest setting
> and I like them. According to VC the medium setting is equivalent to
> Bilstein HD which I find a bit too soft for my taste. If you put it on
> yourself be aware that the Front is quite hard to install.
>



--
"Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis"
La Florida 1513
http://www.nasa.gov/content/florida-to-louisiana-viewed-from-the-international-space-station/#.VBnXJPldVJs