Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2015, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:11:12 -0800
Reply-To:     Neil N <musomuso@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Neil N <musomuso@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Radius Rod Landing on Frame
Comments: To: Jim Felder <jim.felder@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <CAFnDXk0bTauAmPHRXYj7Zu31waMLaRLP6AnexpjBW9Kkazmqfw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 1/20/15, Jim Felder <jim.felder@gmail.com> wrote:

> Neil, it looks like you .... welded it in on top of the old part.

Hi Jim. Yes. This is what I did. I welded a new piece of plate to face of frame.

> The washer technique would yield the same result--new metal for the > hole. The fact that the new part if thicker than or offset to the original > body metal can easily be compensated for by repositioning the washers and > nuts on the threaded end of the rod.

For sure. Yes. Thanks. If we're talking about the castor setting, I understood that adding new metal plate to frame face wouldn't cause an issue in that regard.

This is not a great image:

https://sites.google.com/site/tubaneil2/RadiusArmHoleBack.jpg

but it shows a new bushing installed to the frame I repaired. The black arrow points to lip of the bushing which is not sitting flush to frame face.

Granted this was my first time doing a radius rod bushing job but I assumed that in the case of an un-repaired OEM thickness frame, the bushing lip in frame hole ID should sit flush to face at other side of frame. It appeared to me that adding new metal plate to frame face would position the bushing so that the bushing lip in hole ID wasn't flush to frame face.

Sorry for all the writing I'm doing but it is well intended. :)

> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Neil N <musomuso@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 1/20/15, OlRivrRat <OlRivrRat@comcast.net> wrote: >> >> > The WasherThickness Won't Cause a Prob' ~ Just need to be sure >> that Washer >> > ID Matches the OD >> > >> > of the Step on the RubberBush' or the Alum'Bush if you use T3 ~ >> >> Maybe I missed a detail in a post here or it wasn't made, or I'm just >> thick in the head, (LOL) but I'm assuming the washer in question would >> be welded to face of subframe as per repair I did. Image: >> >> https://sites.google.com/site/tubaneil2/RadiusArmHoleFront.jpg >> >> (my welding has improved some since then. ha ha.) >> >> Are Miguel et al talking about welding a washer, or part of a washer, >> to ID of hole at frame? >> >

-- Neil n

Blog: Vanagons, Westfalia, general <http://tubaneil.blogspot.ca>

1988 Westy Images <https://picasaweb.google.com/musomuso/New1988Westy>

1981 Westfalia "Jaco" Images, technical <http://tubaneil.googlepages.com/>

Vanagon-Bus VAG Gas Engine Swap Group <http://tinyurl.com/khalbay>


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.