Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2015, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 22 Mar 2015 11:21:46 -0700
Reply-To:     Steven Johnson <sjohnso2000@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Steven Johnson <sjohnso2000@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: 2.1 L WBX Overheat -1991 Carat
In-Reply-To:  <BAY405-EAS425EAA975DFDA8F25AE63B1A00C0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I, as well, have had good reliability with the WB with 240K miles with engine and heads being original I certainly can't complain. I do, have an SVX engine I plane to do the transplant when I get an OEM exhaust system from a suitable donor so I can squeeze past the CA DMV referee..

I, personnally, enjoy all of the input from all angles of this list and wouldn't put off anyone for their contributions and biases included. If we want to keep these vehicles like any other long term project, the more the merrier.

Steven 91 Westy

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Not everyone that owns-drives a Vanagon should need to know how to fix it. > Drive and protect it yes, but fix it. Now for the technicians that could be > different. > > The Vanagon is in many ways the last of a breed of vehicles that can be > serviced by most anyone that wants to. If you can use a multi-meter and > know some electrical relationships you can handle and electrical gremlin it > will throw at you. With a good jack and stands you can service anything > including engine and transmission removal. > > Dennis > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf > Of jeff ensing > Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 9:10 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: 2.1 L WBX Overheat -1991 Carat > > Always lurking here. This subject irks me enough to write for the first > time in years. > (apparently) > Peoples troubles with a WBX says more about their skill set than it does > about the product. > Seriously, > If you can't make a WBX work , I would not want you working on my Subaru. > > Happy spring! : ) > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:16 PM, jeff ensing <jeffensing@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Always lurking here. This subject irks me enough to write for the > > first time in years. > > (apparently) > > Peoples troubles with a WBX says more about their skill set than it > > does about the product. > > Seriously, > > If you can't make a WBX work , I would not want you working on my Subaru. > > > > Happy spring! : ) > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Jeff Schwaia <vw.doka@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Well... I'm probably one of the few folks in the USA that have had > >> over a > >> 100 Vanagons (T3s) go through their fingers (and that doesn't include > >> all the customer Vanagons I've worked on since the '80s), and the > >> WBXer "blow up" is not at all a common occurrence. > >> > >> Back when Vanagons could be had for a song, the most common issue was > >> emissions failure. Very few were "blown up" WBXers. Probably 5 or > fewer. > >> > >> In reality, the WBXer design was a huge step forward, reliability > >> wise, than its predecessor. How many air-cooled VW engines went 200k > miles? > >> Whereas, it is not uncommon for a well cared for WBXer to exceed 200k. > >> > >> Haters hate and will always deride those who do not adhere to their > >> philosophy. Perhaps we should ad the WBXer to the no-no list... > >> > >> Politics... Religion... WBXer... All are now off-limits! ;-) > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Jeff > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On > >> Behalf Of Don Hanson > >> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 7:48 AM > >> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > >> Subject: Re: 2.1 L WBX Overheat -1991 Carat > >> > >> See? "Deniers" > >> > >> It does not matter how many times the subject of WBX engine > >> reliability comes up, there are plenty who simply LOVE the WBX motor > >> for some reason that I have never heard adequately explained. > >> > >> There's probably no data collected on how often a WBX blows up > >> compared to any other engine..If there was, I would suspect there would > still be > >> people with their heads in the sand, buying up WBX motors... But > really > >> people....when a popular product has a really notoriously bad > >> reputation for lots of ongoing problems and weak design features, > >> when we just read half a dozen posts about all the bad things that > >> get sent out with rebuilt WBX motors, when the Rap is SO BAD on a > >> product....why would you suppose everyone else is always WRONG about > >> it, and your particular encounter with this product, that will > certainly be different.....? > >> > > > > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.