Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2015, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:18:35 +0000
Reply-To:     Jim Felder <jim.felder@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jim Felder <jim.felder@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Friday..OT..Stuff from WalMart-like stores...
Comments: To: Edward Maglott <emaglott3@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <CABToOYLMuLq3Ly0rjtxNMoNepdA2TKxcViwmy0n4iadwa3VM-w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Yeah, but it (shop dimensions of lumber) happened long ago and since then prices have equalized to the new dimension, which has become the Federal standard. I notice at the home stores, though, that on items as standard and common as quarter round, they are cheating by 1/16 or so, but still calling it the old full dimension. They do not have the excuse that finished lumber has, that they plain it to be "shop sized" to a standard. They are actually reducing the dimension to get a few more out of a board. The new stuff does not match existing work. You either have to drive to a real lumber yard, or tear out all the old work and replace it if you want it to actually match. Plus, the wood itself hardly resembles what you used to buy in a given grade.

In automobiles, you can't likely reduce the dimensions and quality like you can with lumber and tarps, etc. But you can reduce the thickness of material, and then it weighs less and goes faster and gets better mileage, you likely you pay more for the luxury of cheaper materials. But the place they get you in the automotive world is the quality of aftermarket parts, and replacing metal with plastic.

Jim

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:03 PM Edward Maglott <emaglott3@gmail.com> wrote:

> I guess that's true. When did they stop using the rough cut lumber, and > why? I'm sure there is additional profit there in those fractional > differences. > Edward > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Loren Busch <starwagen@gmail.com> wrote: > > > ​RE: "... rather than that newfangled "2 inch > > unfinished size, 1 and 3/4 inch finished size" lumber they use nowadays." > > > > Not 'new' at all, finished lumber (vs. rough cut) has been measured that > > way for at least 100 years probably longer. a rough cut 2x4 is 2"x4" but > > finished (nice and smooth) is 1 3/4" by 3 3/4". > > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.