The Bentley gives spec for the thickness of the spacer as the thickness was increased over the production run. I can't find any specs in Bentley for the spacer length. Some quick measurements from parts in my stash Inner bearing inner race thickness = 17 mm ( that's the nominal thickness, I miked brand new bearing race at 16.95 mm) Inner race, outer bearing thickness = 19 mm ( I miked brand new as 18.93 mm) Spacer, one of my used spacers measures 42.80 mm Add that up, 78.8 mm
On a used stub axle and hub, when hub installed on axle, but not pressed down by nut, just pressed on by hand, space between the surfaces that the inner bearing and the outer bearing lie against measures 76.1 mm. To be clear, the hub is pushed down until it fetches up on the end of the splines. So you have, nominally, 2.7 mm of room before the hub bottoms out on the end of the splines on the stub axle. Alistair
> On Jun 2, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Phil Zimmerman <philzimm1@shaw.ca> wrote: > > Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 07:31:27 -0700 > > Alistair Bell typed: > > Exact length is the important part? > How can you state an exact length without giving tolerances? > If someone was to measure their spacer to be 42.7 mm then is that spacer out of spec? > And does the Bentley manual specific wear limits? > > ------------------------ > > Alistair, > > I took the liberty to post this in the original thread verses the Digest of Frank's post. > > The Spacer-sleeve part in the rear wheel bearing housing shown in the Bentley pg 42.4 . > Length is omitted and no tolerances are printed. What is printed is the "thickness" : 5.4 mm. > A bizarre specification to list? What does this tell? Has the spacer been worn thin?? > Over squished and thus thicker? I dunno..:-( A Bentley mystery. > > Frank ferreted out the length of the spacer from his secret sources and mystery friends.. > Meaning, I do not have a clue where Frank sourced the length specification. > I'm assuming (not always safe to do here) he or others measured new OEM Spacers and recorded the measurements. > > What Frank posted: Length 41.8 mm / 1.65" > no tolerances given.. > > If yours in 42.7 mm long…. yours is too long… cut some off eh? hah,ha,ha… > > On his rock off the West coast > > Phil z. > > |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.