Date:         Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:59:04 -0500
Reply-To:     mcneely4@COX.NET
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Dave Mcneely <mcneely4@COX.NET>
Subject:      Re: camper closet removal? Weekenders cheaper?
Comments: To: James <jk_eaton@HOTMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <Pu6W1r01B08X5Fr01u6jwA>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

I think the reference was to campgrounds with (NA) vs without (non-NA) style.  For my part, my choice is to camp outside a campground.  Next is a campground without water or other "amenities."  However, I've noticed that a table doesn't overcome the lack of water and flush toilets for most, so a table can be beneficial to me.  My whole point of camping is to be by my lonesome (well, the folks who go with me are ok, just not the general rabble).  mcneely

---- James <jk_eaton@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote:
> What's the 'North America Camping Style'?  Hiding out in our giant RVs all weekend, except for the campfire Saturday night?  The Weekender isn't any advantage to that style, given that you have to cook (etc.) outside.
>
> A weekender does lend itself to taking more than four people camping, however.  It just requires outside cooking facilities, a bug tent in buggy conditions, and tents for sleeping space.... don't know if that's more 'North American' or not!
>
> Anyway, fun speculation.
>
> And we love our Weekender!
>
> James
> Ottawa, ON
>
> > Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:12:23 -0700
> > From: dn92610@GMAIL.COM
> > Subject: Re: camper closet removal? Weekenders cheaper?
> > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> >
> > so... could we assume that the weekender was built for North America
> > camping style?
> >
> > :-)
>

--
David McNeely