I was thinking more of the end user doing it as a retrofit. I also saw one in my search that was much like the level gauge on an oil tank. Given all that, it seems that a properly-working level sensor should be sufficient. On Fri, Nov 6, 2015, 10:12 Van O Rama <van.o.rama@gmail.com> wrote: > I recall Mike from RMW mention the cost would jump substantially, if > something like this was incorporated. > > > > BenT > sent from my electronic leash > > > On Nov 6, 2015, at 5:47 AM, Robert Fisher <garciasghostvw@GMAIL.COM> > wrote: > > > > I wonder how hard it would be to fit a gauge like this to the stainless > (?) > > tanks that whichever vendor that is sells ... ? > > > > > http://www.blupaxasia.com/blupax/images/products%5Cliquid_level_gauges%5Clevel_gauges%5Clevel_gauges_industrial_mini.jpg > > > > (Hopefully that link will work.) > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, 14:53 Larry Alofs <lalofs@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > After many experiences with bad caps, including new ones, I continue to > > look for a solution. I hope to retain a tank that is transparent to let > me > > watch for accumulating air. > |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.