Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 06:47:24 -0700
Reply-To: Don Hanson <dhanson928@GMAIL.COM>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: Don Hanson <dhanson928@GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: Engines: what to choose
In-Reply-To: <CAE_+Nq3QrbmSh2_CxP2g9V+UzcHFzp-JJox1F36LkCNA8nCFQg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
The inline VW motor, installed like the standard Vanagon diesel stocker
motor, IS a fairly good choice that often gets ignored when people talk
engines.
These conversions (actually, most are simply 'substitutions' , gas for
diesel...) are a LOT cheaper, and have fewer issues when trying to adapt
to the rest of the van's systems. The common 1.8 liter inline, as it comes
in the Jetta, Fox, Rabbit, Cabriolet, etc etc....those have about 105hp,
similar to a WBX.... they run on Digifant, same as vanagon..you can plug
all the wires right in and drive off without re-flashing any computer or
changing much in the cooling system...Parts are dirt cheap. Engines are
dirt cheap...
A few of us have swapped in an ABA 2.0 liter block, keeping the 1.8
liter head, which fits into a vanagon with no visible interior
mods....These "hybrid" motors make about the same HP as a Subie, plenty for
normal driving..
the drewbacks of the inline VW swap? Haven't found many yet. The
VW inlines make power at higher RPM than a boxer motor, yes....and Tiico
did them a bit wrong for a while, causing people to think every inline
sucked....not so.
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Rob <vwrobb@gmail.com> wrote:
> What Steve said, the vanagon with 130hp is still a vanagon but it merges
> like a real car. The better mileage & dependability were a bonus.
>
> Rob
> vwrobb@gmail.com
>
> On May 26, 2016 8:50 AM, "Stephen Edwards" <chibicyclist@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I’ve had a Subaru 2.2 with KEP’s California legal setup for ten years and
> over 120k miles with no problems, other than that my rebuilt 4 speed tranny
> is beginning to show signs of its age. The difference in power is huge -
> from about 90hp to 130 - more than a 40% increase. But more than the power
> difference is the reliability, (also low end torque is nice, in a city with
> heavy traffic and far too many stop signs). The only work I’ve had done on
> the 2.2 was its routine, 100k timing belt replacement. It’s the engine that
> should have been there to begin with.
>
> The van body is rusted and wearing out so I’m now in the process of doing
> another conversion.
>
> I would recommend going to the subaruvanagon list for more information. It
> is a very well moderated list with some wonderful, helpful and super
> knowledgeable people on it. You won’t regret it.
>
> Steve, 91 GL in Chicago.
>
|