Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2017, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 24 Apr 2017 20:08:59 -0500
Reply-To:     Jeff Palmer <w.jeff.palmer@ICLOUD.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jeff Palmer <w.jeff.palmer@ICLOUD.COM>
Subject:      Re: 1.9 and 2.1 All that different in power?
Comments: To: Steve Bonde <seb007@LIVE.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <CY4PR1401MB1942CE43BB74E3EB954CD9A6E01E0@CY4PR1401MB1942.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Steve any trouble getting service or do you do it all yourself?

Thanks Jeff

> On Apr 24, 2017, at 8:00 PM, Steve Bonde <seb007@LIVE.COM> wrote: > > My 2.5 Subaru fit like a dream thanks to Rocky Mountain Westy, and now I pass cars going up hills at 60mph at 11,000ft. I couldn't believe how much better it ran over Berthoud and Loveland passes than it ever did with the old 2.1. There are a lot fewer hoses and it's now easier to work on. The 1.27 drive in the automatic also makes it run at ~3500rpm @ 70 mph. > > Be a purist if you want, we'll wave when we pass. My kids love the looks they get when people realize they're being passed by a van again...at 11,000ft...on an 8-10% grade. > > Steve B. > '90 Carat > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Apr 24, 2017, at 6:49 PM, Jason <uberhare@GMAIL.COM> wrote: >> >> If both engines are tuned up and running correctly the difference is >> there. Not huge, but enough to help get over some of those hills! My >> Whitestar is running the stock 2.1 on 15" wheels and it cruises well >> between 120-130kph (GPS true speed). I can't say any of my 1.9's ever did >> that very well. >> >> On a side note, my 3H diesel 5 speed showed up on the weekend. 2.0TDI >> project is about to begin.....who wanted a 2,1? :) >> >> Jason >> Uberbus >> >>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Eric Caron <ecaron1@comcast.net> wrote: >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I’d be interested in hearing from those that have had both a 1.9 >>> and a 2.1 motor. >>> >>> A friend replaced his 1.9 last year with a rebuilt 2.1 and said it was >>> stronger but not anything to write home about. He seemed to think his 1.9 >>> was close enough that I keep considering maybe just getting my 1.9 re built >>> by one of our skilled list members. >>> >>> So, what real differences in power are there? >>> >>> And, are there any benefits to my earlier 1.9? >>> >>> Eric Caron >>> 85 GL Auto >>> >>>


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.