Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2017, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 9 Jul 2017 11:12:32 -0700
Reply-To:     "Annie S. Anderson" <helloanniesue@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         "Annie S. Anderson" <helloanniesue@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Subaru engine gas mileage
Comments: To: Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <CY1PR20MB0029FA078ABE76125A6402FDA0A80@CY1PR20MB0029.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Transmission was rebuilt 7 years ago when I bought it and did all the initial work and I’ve really only put about 3000 miles on it since then. It’s not my daily driver.

Build empires. Create Legacy. ------------ Annie S. Anderson

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Sounds like as with most Water Boxers a support system failed and killed > the engine. A conversion does not make this possibility for the future go > away. There is a cost to replace your engine in like kind or drop in a 2.1L > and then to bring everything else up to snuff to support it. Having a > conversion done by any of the converters will likely increase that cost by > 50 to 100%. Then if the vehicle is tired in other areas which I find is > typical once an engine is needed then you get to spend more there. If the > transmission-drive line is weak increased engine power will finish it off. > I have been around VWs and I can tell you that when the Vanagons went water > cooled I had to learn how to do transmissions as they seem to fail much > more often than the engines. Have someone really go over the suspension and > other systems and put together a long term finance plan. Once you do the > engine another $10K+ is not uncommon. > > Dennis > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf > Of Annie S. Anderson > Sent: Sunday, July 9, 2017 12:05 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Subaru engine gas mileage > > Thanks, guys! > > Yeah, it’s time. It overheated, cracked the H-pipe and and needs hoses and > now who knows what else. I’ve heard that fixing an overheated engine is an > expensive matter. So, I figured Subaru engine conversion is the way to go. > > Sounds like it’s definitely a good choice. > > Anything I should prepare for or know as far as auto trans goes, other > than what Steve mentioned about the larger ring and pinion? > > > > > Build empires. Create Legacy. > ------------ > Annie S. Anderson > > On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Steve Bonde <seb007@live.com> wrote: > > > Oh, and the Subie passed the emissions inspection better than the WBX, > > which I had to detune for it to pass here. It failed twice in Richland, > WA. > > Here in CO the inspection seems more thorough and the Subie passed > > first time with no problem. There was actually another Westin in line > > and his WBX failed. He said he was thinking about the conversion and > > was more convinced after I passed with flying colors and he had a > > couple of days to retune his to get it to pass. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Jul 9, 2017, at 2:12 AM, Stacy Schneider <vwcrewman@GMAIL.COM> > wrote: > > > > > > 2.2 in a Syncro Westy. 22 on a trip to Baja. 18 on a trip to Tahoe > > > from > > the > > > bay area. A vast improvement from the worn out 2.1 WBX I had. > > > > > >> On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Rob <vwrobb@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> When I put a 93 subie 2.2 in my 87 vanagon the mileage went up > > >> about 1 > > mpg > > >> & I could merge like a real car. That 130hp fit the vanagon well. > > >> > > >> When I put a subie 2.2 in my 84 westy the mileage went up, I could > > >> still merge like a real car but on long hills (going to eastern WA) > > >> I had to downshift to keep it at the speed limit. > > >> > > >> The subie 2.2 was great in the vanagon! > > >> > > >> > > >> Rob > > >> vwrobb@gmail.com > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Jul 8, 2017 5:30 PM, "Annie S. Anderson" <lsandrsn@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hey Gang, > > >> > > >> Been a few years since I’ve posted! I’ve been toying with selling > > >> my 85 Vanagon for a while but recently decided to go ahead with the > > >> Subaru > > engine > > >> conversion so I’ve got some questions for those of you who’ve done it. > > . . > > >> > > >> The biggie is - what’s the gas mileage like? > > >> > > >> And for those of you in Washington State - have you had any issues > > >> with licensing or registering your Vanagon with a Subaru engine? Is > > >> there anything special I should consider or know about? > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > >> > > >> ~Annie > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Build empires. Create Legacy. > > >> ------------ > > >> Annie S. Anderson, > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > 1989 Swedish Tristar with Aluminum gates and Atiwe 16" Wheels. > > > Oldest son is an Eagle scout. > > > > ᐧ >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.