Yes, I am. What image? Oh, drat! https://get.google.com/albumarchive/117189706757545167023/album/AF1QipM8wTJmM98E-ZNqPvdU4zOsxJLZYLy9r_0R45-b/AF1QipOX1Ep6Wwd4Ezff1Xmqva07-oC4fQCYjREyTi3E Yrs, d On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Larry Alofs <lalofs@gmail.com> wrote: > So, are you saying that the AFM on a 1.9 should give the same voltage > reading as one from a 2.1, but with 10% less flow, because its displacement > is about 10% less? > > Larry A. > what image? > > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 4:14 PM, David Beierl <dbeierl@attglobal.net> > wrote: > >> I'd be extremely wary (as in run far away) about attempting to adjust the >> AFM tension spring. >> >> However, by improvising a flow bench using a shop vac, throttle body, and >> a >> second good AFM, you can easily adjust the spring to match the good one. >> Here's an image showing three AFMs in series -- I was adjusting the 1.9l >> one which had been breathed on by idjits, and it was easy enough to set it >> to read ten percent higher than the 2.1l ones with equal flow. >> >> Yrs, >> d >> > > |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.