Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 18:27:53 -0400
Reply-To: Eric Caron <eric.caron@ICLOUD.COM>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: Eric Caron <eric.caron@ICLOUD.COM>
Subject: Re: No Orig' Posts
In-Reply-To: <892932241.6421548.1552947727212@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
I have had many people lately say my iCloud email goes to junk. Still I don’t think that it is likely that it is just we iCloud folks! But, you never know.
Eric Caron
> On Mar 18, 2019, at 6:22 PM, Richard Koerner <rjkinpb@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> Hey, I think I may have a clue to what is going on: things "often" go to SPAM folder. Especially if you have an Apple product. Like just now Eric Caron, with your "icloud.com" email....it went to SPAM first. However, DeanB's post before yours appeared just fine.
>
> I can't explain why this is happening....but I think it may be the cause. Gerry.Vanagon.Com may be too ancient to deal with new Apple products.
>
> Rich
>
> San Diego
>
> On Monday, March 18, 2019, 3:09:46 PM PDT, Eric Caron <eric.caron@ICLOUD.COM> wrote:
>
>
> Exactly,
>
> Same here. I get a reply to a message but never did I get the original message to the list. This has nothing to do with cutting out content or editing the reply.
>
> Likely that people post, never get a response and wonder why. When many of us never saw the original post.
>
> Eric Caron
>
>
> > On Mar 18, 2019, at 6:05 PM, OlRivrRat <OlRivrRat@COMCAST.NET <mailto:OlRivrRat@COMCAST.NET>> wrote:
> >
> > Some may have misunderstood My post to mean that I am not seeing
> >
> > the Orig' Post within a Reply ~ That Was Not the Point I was attempting to make ~
> >
> > I Am Often receiving Replies to a Post while Never Having Received the Original ~
> >
> > The Result being that I don't know what the Question/Issue/Symptoms posted by
> >
> > the O'P' might have been ~
> >
> > May Be that some O'P's might be EDressing to an Individual instead of the
> >
> > VanagonGerry Group ~
> >
> > ORR ~ DeanB
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 18 Mar , 2019, at 12:26 PM, C. Abney wrote:
> >
> >> I do remember back in the day (*sound of bones creaking*) that typing
> >> one's response /above/ the included text was considered to be close to
> >> an act of illiteracy.
> >>
> >> In my (HTML only) gmail screen there is a check-box which, by default
> >> is checked, to include that included text, but putting the cursor
> >> /after/ it seems never to have been an option.
|