The original reason for no photos was because of limited bandwidth, I believe. Is the bandwidth still a limiting factor for photos? I know that we used to be encouraged to trim previous posts when we replied, but that doesn't seem to be happening now. On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 9:00 PM Todd P Last <Rubatoguy@comcast.net> wrote: > IMHO the list would benefit from allowing the attachment of photos - that > is really the big negative of the list - and I think one of the reasons > people migrated to other venues. > Personally, I don't like Facebook as a venue for interest groups, but that > is just because I don't like Facebook. > > Todd > '88 Westy > |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.