Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2019, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 9 Sep 2019 10:15:28 -0700
Reply-To:     Neil N <musomuso@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Neil N <musomuso@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: AHU MTDI vs. ABA?
Comments: To: Chris S <szpejankowski@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <8074947B-7669-45EF-B1BB-641AEE8A8487@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

This is not a proper comparison but I do notice a significant difference in overall power between the stock ABA used engine with unknown miles in my 1981 westy and the more powerful ABA I rebuilt that's in my 1988 westy. Both are OBD1 so are basically identical except for the air filter box type. Each uses a 4-1 exhaust manifold and single downpipe. I have not done a compression test on either though. With just me and my gear I have to downshift to 3rd to hold ~ 50+ mph on long steepish grades.

Back in 2008 when I started doing my first swap I had wanted to do either a Suby 2.2 or TD but local donor engines were usually high mile beat up units. From what I've read and heard, modifying turbos etc can introduce potential variables but then I guess any swap platform can potentially have those challenges. On my first swap, in terms of the engine itself, I've had no real issues and most if not all bugs were introduced by me (steep learning curves, custom DIY type parts). I like that the engine is simple and reliable.

FWIW I'm seeing about 21 MPG (US gallons) on the highways on both ABA swaps. Both have the same WBX style tranny and ~ tire OD.

Neil.

On Monday, September 9, 2019, Chris S <szpejankowski@gmail.com> wrote:

> Wiadomość napisana przez Stacy Schneider <vwcrewman@gmail.com> w dniu > 08.09.2019, o godz. 12:00: > > > > What is the attraction to a Diesel conversion? The long and short term > costs do not offset the fuel savings. > > 1. VW familiarity > 2. Torque > 3. More torque > 4. Maintain speed uphill with torque. > > I stated In my original post I have an ABA conversion in a Westy Syncro. > I have lots of power on top, especially with Techtonics cam, chip, AEG > exhaust manifold. I can cruise at 80, a speed I actually can hit in third > gear. But, loaded with family and weekend camping stuff, 3 bikes, the low > torque just isn’t there to manage hills easily and I end up using that 3-6K > rpm powerband. I figure I can drop an AHU MTDU in there for about 3 grand > doing the installation myself. First world problems, I know.

-- Neil n

VE7TBN

1988 Westy 50º ABA swap: https://tinyurl.com/yap5hpwt

1981 Westy 15º ABA swap: https://tinyurl.com/y9n4xob8

VAG Gas Engine Swap Group <http://tinyurl.com/khalbay>


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.