Date:         Sat, 9 Nov 2019 09:03:50 -0800
Reply-To:     Neil N <musomuso@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Neil N <musomuso@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: horse power
In-Reply-To:  <CAObFu5reFr7RqWjzXs-NYvvVjMsoBMtPKDWzwpEYDF9gZfGLgw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Agreed. I think how the van is driven can be the bigger factor. And
the temptation to drive it harder is there even with a small HP
increase.

My first conversion to Jetta engine was done on an air cooled Vanagon
with tired engine. I drove that van differently, right away. Same for
the '88 I converted to the same engine. I rebuilt that engine. It has
even better acceleration. The HP increase from the stock 2.1 is not
huge but since the rebuilt engine allows it, (so far, LOL), at times I
shift at higher RPM than I would with the 2.1 WBX. And, I shift
"harder" at times as well.

Neil.

On 11/9/19, Sudhir Desai <sudhir.desai@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would qualify that with a "depends how you drive".


>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2019, 8:42 AM Dan N <dn92610@gmail.com> wrote:

>> > - what's a safe upper margin amount of horse power for a vanagon NOT
>> > detrimental to the transaxle.



-- 
Neil n

VE7TBN

1988 Westy 50º ABA swap: https://tinyurl.com/yap5hpwt

1981 Westy 15º ABA swap: https://tinyurl.com/y9n4xob8

VAG Gas Engine Swap Group <http://tinyurl.com/khalbay>