Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2023, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 24 Apr 2023 22:00:43 -0700
Reply-To:     David McNeely <davmcneely40@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David McNeely <davmcneely40@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: metal coolant bottles Friday thoughts.
Comments: To: Eric Caron <ericcaron96@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To:  <4DA4F00F-432A-4804-B681-FA1494CC04D7@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Well, I ordered the GW bottle. Seems to be a toss up re which one is better. Sure seems like a lot of money, but everyone seems to think the plastic bottles are pretty much crap now. Spending a lot on this camper to get it up to the travels I hope to put on it this summer.

BTW, I also placed an order with Van Cafe, and was charged shipping. So, I cancelled and will check with them tomorrow. Their web site says no shipping charge ever. Does anyone know what's going on?

On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 8:32 PM Eric Caron <ericcaron96@comcast.net> wrote:

> Wow! > > Very helpful info. This makes it clear which one I would get when the > time comes. > > And, without this I would have likely chosen the wrong one. > > One comment on price. The VC option would now have free shipping so that > might make the cost closer to the GW version. > > The ability to update from 1.9 to 2.1 system would be my deciding factor. > The sensor also sounds like a better choice to me. > But, for you sighted folks that window in the GW one would be nice. > Eric Caron > > > Eric Caron > > > > > On Apr 21, 2023, at 6:53 PM, Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM> > wrote: > > > > Yes we made it to Friday. Yea! > > Regarding the original plastic pressure tanks one needs to consider how > important it is to the Vanagon cooling system and the ways in which they > fail. Not only do they just hold coolant but the design is such that it > ensures coolant is available to the suction side of the pump avoiding air > entrapment or a vortex. In addition it provides a place for dirt and other > debris to settle out. Both aftermarket tanks may not do this as well. > > > > Regarding failure yes they usually fail somewhat slowly and have some > warning. However I have seen the center seem suddenly fail, the top swell > over, the threads distort enough for the cap to separate. In addition to > the tank itself the pressure cap is also a high failure item due both > design and quality. Being almost all plastic it is also damaged by > excessive heat and pressure overtime and really the only way to know if it > is good is to test it. The Metal tanks address both the tank and cap > concerns. While many have older tanks that may still be good I would > suspect that some of these tanks are also in use on vehicles with cooling > systems that are not working properly and holding pressure. The newer tanks > are also of such poor materials that there use has some risk, along with > the pressure caps. > > > > So now for the 2 most common replacement choices. I have used the Van > café and GoWesty. Both are good. Here are the major differences. > > > > The Van Café has been around the longest. The good is that the level > sensor just requires a single wire connection and the fittings are > threaded, replaceable. This is nice if you get a tank for a 1.9L and then > later upgrade the cooling system to the 2.1L design. It also gives some > flexibility if you want to some modifications such as gauge ports or add a > coolant filter. For the bad there is no way to see the coolant level > without opening the cap, the screw for the sensor wire connection tends to > loosen, and there shroud around the sensor probe. The splash from the > coolant entering the tank can satisfy the sensor system so you may geta > delayed indication that coolant is being lost or that a head or gasket > problem is pushing the coolant out of the tank. > > > > The GoWesty tank has slight cost advantage, and uses the stock level > sensor probe. The probe is shrouded like the original so the warning system > should work the same. The sight glass is beneficial as you can see if the > level is dropping without removing the cap. You can also view this from the > license plate door. The bad is that sometimes the plastic sensor probes > leak or even crack and the plug connection is sometimes a problem. Broken > and corroded wires or the crimps-pins can cause some grief. Also, the hose > fittings are not replaceable. So if you buy for a 1.9L, and later upgrade > you will need to also upgrade the tank. > > > > Amongst the benefits of the metal tanks is the use of a standard > pressure cap. The cap design is easily inspected and both the system and > cap can now be tested with equipment that any shop, anywhere should have. > Also, there is now choice of pressure cap settings. For the Vanagon there > is no reason that anything higher than12 psi is needed. As the system is > designed to have a solid liquid fill the pressure cap is not just for > safety, it is actually a control device dealing with the liquid expansion > every time part of the cooling system increases in temperature and allowing > for coolant return as any part of the system cools. The operation of this > cap is also the final auto bleed for the system which is why the tank is > plumbed so close to the suction side of the pump. > > > > Due to some design features of the engine having the system always > pressurized is critical for heat transfer at the top of the cylinder > sleeves and avoiding cavitation erosion of the sleeves and studs. While the > gauge gives an indication of the bulk coolant temperature many parts get > much hotter and having the coolant vaporize or flash of these parts is > similar to having a pot on a stove go dry with the burner still on. > Aluminum and gaskets do not take this well. This should be considered when > postponing needed repairs. > > > > > > Dennis > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com> On Behalf Of > David McNeely > > Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 11:36 PM > > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > > Subject: Re: metal coolant bottles > > > > BTW, my current plastic bottle is 14 yo, so what do I want? I probably > won't even be alive in 14 more years, and despite the scare verbage on the > GoWesty site, I don't think the bottles actually fail suddenly. Rather, > they get a small crack that grows over time. At least that's what happened > with mine, and monitoring it has worked. I WILL replace it, but with which > tank? > > > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 8:04 PM Alistair Bell < > ragnarhairybreeks@icloud.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Dave > >> > >> I’d have no issue with either except I wonder, with no evidence or > >> experience, abiut the level Sender in each unit. > >> My first reply was reheat by list serv > >> > >> Anyway , that’s my only unknown > >> > >> Ab > >> > >> > >> > >> On Apr 20, 2023, at 7:54 PM, David McNeely <davmcneely40@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>  > >> Oh, I have no doubt that the people who make them are charging > >> properly for what they've put into them. It is just a lot of money, > >> especially compared to the plastic ones. BTW, my local mechanic says > >> go with the plastic. But mine now has a slight crack at the neck, as > >> well as the cap not fitting properly any longer (cap threads a bit > >> askew). It is the German cap, too. > >> > >> But my question now is, which aluminum tank? mcneely > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 6:49 PM Alistair Bell < > >> ragnarhairybreeks@icloud.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Dave, all I can say that despite the price those tanks are a good deal. > >>> You’d be hard pressed to find anyone good to make them less > expensively . > >>> > >>> Ab > >>> > >>>> On Apr 20, 2023, at 6:07 PM, David McNeely <davmcneely40@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Ok, so I may be ready to take the plunge and spend an ungodly > >>>> amount of money for a metal coolant expansion bottle. GoWesty, Van > >>>> Cafe? Which > >>> is > >>>> better and why? I like that the GoWesty bottle has a sight glass, > >>>> but > >>> then > >>>> the original plastic ones can't be seen without opening the engine > >>>> compartment, and that seemed to be ok. I have read that the GoWesty > >>> bottle > >>>> can fail at the sensor port just like the plastic ones. Is that true? > >>> Are > >>>> there any others available. mcneely > >>> > >> >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.