On Sat, 16 Apr 1994 RGOLEN@umassd.edu wrote: > What I see here is one of two things. The first VWUS is doing a piss- > poor job of selling their product, or at least informing the buyer > about the product and how it is different, better than other vans; or > the second, most of you are taking your positions in this "discussion" > with little or no factual or actual EV experience. I will assume that > it is the former not the latter. Actually, it has to be (by your meticulous data) both. > As to the "minivan" designation, we all know how RELIABLE Consumer > Reports is when it comes to VWs. Or anything. I wasn't using that as a strict datapoint, just as a demonstration of the impression. > As Sgt. Friday used to say: "Just the facts...." The facts are much appreciated! Thanks. This is all moot to me as I'll never buy a new car, so the Eurovan is about 10 years off for me. -- Gerry Gerald Skerbitz <gsker@lenti.med.umn.edu> U of MN Med.School.Admin 6-5379 1984 VW Vanagon Waterboxer 1915
|
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.