Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 1994)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 8 Apr 1994 8:59:15 -0400 (EDT)
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         Jonathan Dove - VAX Master <JDOVE@gsvms2.cc.gasou.edu>
Subject:      RE: Crashworthiness of Vanagons?

> From: stephens@erctitan.me.wisc.edu (Phil Stephenson) > To: Multiple recipients of list <vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu> > Subject: Crashworthiness of Vanagons? > X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas > X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11] > > > I just test drove an 86 Vanagon today. I must say that I was amazed how > quiet, powerful, and otherwise well-behaved it seemed to me, compared to > my old 77 Westfalia. I am considering getting one of these vehicles sometime > soon, but I am wondering what the wisdom is regarding the ability of Vanagons > to keep their passengers healthy during a crash. Other that going and looking > up old Consumer Reports ( which would tell me to go buy a new Honda Refrigerator > (TM)), I don't really no where to turn for this info. Any help you can give > would be appreciated.

I believe that according to government tests that the driver will have massive injuries or death. I can't remember what it was for the passenger. When I go to junk yards I sometimes look at wrecked vehicles to see how they are contructed and what damage they have taken. I have yet to see a wrecked Vanagon. This brings up an interesting note. In Autoweek magazine, sometime ago, they had a list of vehicle accident rates and the Vanagon had the second lowest rate. (I think the lowest was the Volvo station wagon.) It probably got this ranking due to its large size and slower speeds and that most Vanagon drivers are mature experienced drivers.

> BTW, here's the deal on the Vanagon I tested: 115K, clean inside and very little > rust, no records, but the clutch feels good, and it looks like there has been no > head work. Also, it has a new water pump. The place wants $3995, but I already

Our Vanagon is on its third water pump. Water pump replacement is normal it seems.

> know that I could have it for $3100, or $2000 if I trade in my Audi Coupe (83, > with 135K). How does this compare to deals you have gotten?

That price seems reasonable from what I see in the local papers.

Jonathan

----------------------------------------- Jonathan Dove jdove@gsvms2.cc.gasou.edu 82 Rabbit PU, 83 GTI, 85 Vanagon, 87 Golf -----------------------------------------


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.