Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 1994)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 08 Jul 94 08:49:46 CDT
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         Joel Walker <JWALKER@ua1vm.ua.edu>
Subject:      Re: cv-joints: Constant Velocity Marihuana?

On Fri, 8 Jul 94 05:36:18 CDT William Warburton said: > This I'm not convinced about- given that the drive plates at the >transmission end are constrained (by the torsion bar suspension) to >remain essentially parallel to the ones at the wheel end, it seems to >me that the angle subtended by the driveshaft must be identical at each >CV. I agree that the wheel must effectively do most of the moving but >in practice the geometry dictates that the angles that the CVs take on >must be the same. > Intuitively the wheel does the moving, in practice the joints experience >identical motion. > I may be wrong but if so then I would appreciate an explanation of why :-).

hmmmmm. the man has a point. :( i guess it is true that while the transmisison end OUTER shell doesn't move much, the inner shell has to move with the axle and so, must match angle for angle with the wheel end (of the axle).

rats. if it's too good to be true, it must be. but it sure SEEMS like that wheel-end joint, moving up and down as much as the wheel does, OUGHT to be doing something MORE than the wall-flower-transmission-end. i wish i had paid more attention to which end had more burnt spots. well, i can always check the current set when i do them in a little while. i'm gonna still try (if they are not toooo burnt) to swap ends and see how far i can go.

i do remember reading something about vw changing the transmission for the water-cooled vanagons, and part of that change was to relocate the cv-joint so that there was a zero-degree angle front-to-back-of-the-car between the two joints on each axle. it seems that on all the older buses, there had been a small angle there, in addition to the large angle of up-to-down from transmission to wheel ends. but, again, the angle does have to be the same at each end IF the joints are parallel. aha! but what if they are NOT parallel? hmmmmm. nah.

ok. so what have we got? 1. joints need grease. 2. more grease is better than less grease. 3. grease dries out. needs cleaning off and replacing. 4. joint boots dry out and crack and get cut. need replacing eventually. 5. flipping/reversing should extend the life of the joint for a while longer. 6. bolts can be a bitch to get out. best to have lots of options. 7. star-bolts is better bolts if you can get them. 8. re-check the bolts after a while. they might loosen up.

did i miss anything? joel


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.