Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 1994)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 19 Oct 94 23:35:26 CDT
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         "J. Walker" <JWALKER@ua1vm.ua.edu>
Subject:      Re: leaking head gasket

On Wed, 19 Oct 94 22:11:38 CDT Will Self said: >I asked my local mechanic about it and he suggested retorquing the >head gaskets. He checked it out and said yes, there is a very tiny leak, so >he did the retorquing. This is an idea someone may wish to consider.

if i remember rightly, there was a recall for re-torquing the heads on the early (83? 84?) model vanagons with water-cooled engines. maybe they get loose again?

>He also insists that VW coolant is no better than other coolant, that >nowadays all coolant is designed to be tolerated by aluminum parts. So >I'm not sure what to believe in that area.

if it were just vw saying it, i would be pretty skeptical myself. BUT ... it happened to a friend with a toyota truck. he said that toyota said to use only their phosphate-free coolant, but he didn't believe it and used prestone instead. his head gasket leaked and kinda dissolved and clogged up his radiator. he was very surprised about the vw engines and the phosphate info and, since it seemed to be almost identical (what happened to his truck engine) to what was happening to the vw bus engines, he was convinced that (phosphate in his anti-freeze) was what messed up his engine. he drives the truck about 40,000 miles a year, so it would likely 'wear out' the coolant pretty quick. he got the head gasket and radiator fixed and now uses only the toyota stuff.

when i was silly enough to buy a mercedes last year, i noticed that they (MB) also were very adamant about using phosphate-free coolant in their engines.

so i'm not quite so skeptical as i might be. i think i am NOT hurting my engine (just my wallet!) by using the vw stuff. but i can't say that anyone who uses other stuff IS hurting their engine. i just don't know.

what i THINK is that maybe the vw stuff will last two years, and the prestone stuff will last only one year, before it NEEDS to be replaced. if the guy from BASF <the folks who make Zerex and the vw stuff (and who make something called Zerex Extreme, a new non-phosphate coolant)> was right, the key here is to REPLACE the coolant regularly, like every other year or even every year.

it kinda makes sense: if you change your oil to get rid of crud and acids and renew its lubricating ability, then why not do the same to all the fluids in your car? we know you need to replace brake fluid, right? so why not the coolant? especially since the current engines are smaller, run hotter, and have more 'exotic' metals in them (than the old solid-iron big-mutha engines of the 40's and 50's).

so that's what i think.

joel


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.