Steve asks: > Speaking of automatics, what's the reliability and MPG penalty? Because > of my wifes shoulder injury I'm considering the automatic. Would hate > to loose any hard to come by power though! Temporarily, I have an '85 with 1.9l and an at and an '87 4spd w/2.1l I like an automatic. If you have young kids around that need some attention while driving (replacing a pacifier etc) the auto is nice. great on hills and city traffic. our dealer says he sees few at problems. you don't have to worry about the parking brake cable rusting/freezing up on you as much. its much easier to drink a pop with an auto. Now. they do sap power, pretty noticably. about a 2-3 mpg penalty on the highway, less it seems in city driving. I like the power of the 2.1 and 4spd. the 4spd shifts easy (2 fingers on the knob). given everything, I would vote for the 2.1l engine with a 4spd for myself. the vans just don't have that much power to spare. HOWEVER, since your wife has physical constraints, do not be afraid of the auto. in fact there will be aspects of it you thoroughly enjoy i can't speak for anything but the wasserboxer autos.
|
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.