On Fri, 3 Mar 95 10:21:09 CST <stevie@tekgen.bv.tek.com> said: >Speaking of automatics, what's the reliability and MPG penalty? Because >of my wifes shoulder injury I'm considering the automatic. Would hate >to loose any hard to come by power though! when i had my 1991 vanagon with automatic (for about a year), my mpg average was about 18 mpg ... which wasn't too bad considering that the manual gets about 19.5 average (for 83,000 miles. the 91 auto had 13,000 miles). in town, it's great (no shifting) but the mpg suffers more: about 16 mpg in town. don't know about reliability, though. mine seemed to use a bit of tranny oil every month or so. not very much at all, but since i had never had an automatic before, i was worried about it. the service folks said it was no big deal (for the amount it was using). so i don't know. i was actually impressed with the bus ... but my left foot sure felt funny, and i'd keep stabbing at air with that foot every time i came up to a stop. the auto is NOT any speed-demon, and it shifts a little funny if you drive near a shift point (it'll keep going up, down, up, down) ... so i would either speed up a couple of mph or slow down to keep the tranny happy. joel
|
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.