Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 1995)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 14 Apr 1995 16:01:16 -0400
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         drew@interport.net (Derek Drew)
Subject:      Busses To Drown Vanagons?

I have had a sense of dread for some time about the list and it goes like this:

--there were a lot more busses sold in USA than Vanagons

--Busses break down more often than Vanagons and require more TLC (read: obscure net knowledge)

--busses can have a lot more weird non-factory configurations (and so need more obscure net knowledge)

So...eventually, as the bus people found out about the Vanagon list, the bus mail would drown out the Vanagon mail.

On the other hand....

--internet access still costs money and requires some expertise, so the people on the list would be skewed toward those who had higher income and therefore might own Vanagons.

--the name "Vanagon" as the mailing list title would slightly encourage Vanagon owners to join and discourage bus owners and so this would have the effect of counterbalance any tendancy of the bus people to drown out the Vanagon people.

Now...

...some of this makes no difference, as , for example, the procedure to do the brake drums is probably the same on both the bus and the Vanagon. And it is the same set of evil dealers we all have to deal with. And lots of us have owned both busses and Vanagons and so can hand down knowledge to current bus owners. And the 80-82 Vanagons have more in common with the busses (engine-wise) than the other Vanagons, so there is no way to properly isolate Vanagon mail from non-Vanagon mail. That is, this makes it impractical to have people to add in the subject lines of their posts "V:Subject" for Vanagon "B:subject" for busses and "S:subject" for splits.

The way it works now seems to be that the splits tend to put their year in the subject line, like "56 Tranny Swap." The busses often use the word "bus" in their subject, or you can tell it is a bus post because they are about heat (lack of; desire for) or you can tell it is a Vanagon post because it says something about a wiring harness or electrical hiccups while on the road (or coolent). You can pretty much figure it is a post about the 80-82 Vanagons with it says "911 motor" or "6-cyl setup".

So I guess things are working out just about right.

But I wonder if over the next two years as the internet explodes 5x yet again, whether the current mix of articles between busses and Vanagons (50-50%?) will still continue. There are a *lot* of 'dem pesky busses out there. Derek Drew drew@interport.net (preferred) DerekDrew@aol.com (if interport is down)


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.