Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 1995)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 18 Apr 1995 19:14:14 -0700
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         eugp@uclink3.berkeley.edu (Eugene C. Palmer)
Subject:      Re: The Berg and springs

>Hmmm... I don't think my bus would go 60 in third without blowing up. Even >50 scares me, as I'm sure it is approaching 5000 RPM. What year van is >this that you are talking about?

Most buses I've driven '63,'67,'71, (this one is 1971) I have taken to 60 in third, I used to take the squareback to 70. I will rev that high if I have a loaded, (this means four or five people and gear) and I'm on a long hill that I know fourth won't quite hold if I shift. I'd rather a lightly loaded high rev than a bogged down 2250 rpm. I reprimand any driver of my bus that shifts too early, or too late on a down shift (~48-52mph into the hill). I've followed trucks down hills at 90 and the engine sounded great.

>I agree with Eugene that one should watch their valve train closely in >any case, but I don't see the need for dual springs in any type IV bus >application. The motors are not designed to be revved past 5,000 RPM. >IMHO, dual springs will just add wear and tear on the valvetrain and >lead to premature cam or lifter failure.

I believe my Haynes book, 4400 rpm limit on the bus, after that, HD singles or duals.

>In a bus, I would go for reliability and get the lowest >rate springs that could sustain 5,000 RPM (stock springs are more than >adequate than this). > >Berg's pushing of dual springs and pooh poohing of hydraulic lifters >is making me think they are only concerned with building race engines >for Beetles, but I don't know that much about them. > Berg has done thousands of tests and drives and has driven buses of all kinds himself. His 1971 is famous. I believe him, reliability is relative, and...... .....4400 rpm, 65mph in a bus, no higher or you'll burn your stock single spring exhaust valves. As for the hydraulics, I think he's mostly talking about the long run, 45,000 miles down the road situation when the engine is hot, stopped, and then won't hold hydraulic pressure. I believe that too.

Sincerely, Eugene '71


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.