Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 1995)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         20 Sep 1995 09:34:43 +1000
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         "King, Robert" <king@tanelorn.aod.dsto.gov.au>
Subject:      RE: Da Boat 2 litre

Dave writes

>different crankcase breather box (no big deal, except that it might tip >off the smog weenies that this was not a stock 1.7 engine) I decided at >that point that I was going to have to transfer the internals of this >engine to a 1.7 case that came with Jeff's engineless Westy.

Hmmm. Are *all* the smoggers this alert? Seems to me that if you could scrub round this one it would be better (and cheaper) to leave everything in the 2.0 litre case and go with an electric fuel pump. Basically if you want to transfer eveything into another case you're going to have to pay for machining, bearings etc (you can't go putting parts with an established wear pattern straight into another case - I don't mean to insult your intelligence, I'd guess from reading your posts you realise this....)

>My friend at the machine shop said not to worry about the scoring on the >cylinder wall - said he could probably just hone it, or that I could >probably get away with leaving it that way. In his defense, he did want >to look at it first. What does the list think?

>Also, can I remove the pistons from the barrels and then reinstall them >later, without messing up the rings?

These questions are all sorta related. I am personally loathe to spend lots of bucks if its not required. And if all the bits are within spec then there's no need to replace everything. So what I would do is pull the 2.0 litre down and have a look at it. Measure it all up for wear. Check the bearings, measure the journals, bores, pots, rings (closure and landings) and see if they are still within spec - remember the cam/bearings cos they're what go first in Type IV engines. If they are all close to spec I would just get the barrels honed and put it all back together - there is no problem reassembling an engine providing everything goes back where it came from. If the rings are worn but the bores/pots/landings are still tolerable I would put in new rings and then reassemble etc. A Type IV actually has to have down a *lot* of miles or been *harshly* treated to have a badly worn bottom end (bit like people eh?)

If the whole lot is *well* worn then you're going to have to pay for the whole schemoozle anyway and then it's probably time to consider a case switch.

Rob K.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.