Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 1995)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 20 Sep 95 17:20:11 PDT
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         Dave Kautz <dkautz@hpsidms1.sid.hp.com>
Subject:      Is '78 a good year

Paul Smiley wrote:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the '78 the best year for the late type II's (I know that's hard to say without comment). I say that based on the availablility of the 2.0 engine during these years. I understand that the hydraulic lifters are a benefit as well the exhaust system (which is still fairly easy to find vs. the '79 version). I'm assuming that the version of automatic transmission used was improved from the first version a few years previous (just a guess). I have been told that the fuel injection on the later models is also a benefit over the earlier buses. If these are points of debate, please let me know (as well as any other suggestions you may have). Around here buses are hard enough to come by and I want to make sure I get the best year I can.

I'd say a good part of the reputation for desireability that the '78 bus has is based on the hydraulic lifters, for which '78 was the first year. However, any type IV engine can be upgraded to hydraulics and many have as they were rebuilt. Some folks prefer the sliding side windows over the earlier "vent wing" type too. I wouldn't put too much emphasis on the exhaust system since some '75-'78 exhaust parts aren't particularly easy to come by and expensive when you do. The pre '75 exhaust system, shared with the European market buses, is simpler and parts are still available.

To answer you basic question about which is the best year, my reply is something of a sidestep. My opinion is that these vehicles are all so old now that the condition of what you are considering far outweighs the subtleties of the year to year changes. And as I pointed out with the hydraulic lifters, you can often fit a desireable feature from one year to another. Some caveats: If you are considering a westy, get the camper layout you want - the campers changed a lot more than the buses did. It doesn't sound like you are considering earlier buses with the type I engine, but that would be another thing to have your mind made up on in advance of shopping.

Finding a sound, straight, body with a minumum of rust is probably your best bet as a first priority - all the other stuff is much easier to fix up to your liking.

Dave


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.