Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 1995)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 1 Sep 1995 18:27:28 -0400
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         SSGSPEAR@aol.com
Subject:      Re: Bentley 

In a message dated 95-08-31 14:16:47 EDT, kerch@parc.xerox.com writes:

>Save up if you have to. and by all means shop for a lower price, (try Classic >Motorbooks, or other auto-specific book mail-order places and let us know if

>it works) but GET THAT BOOK.

Classic Motor Books, in Osceola, WI is have a show/sale on the 9th and 10th of September, if I remember right. Books are to be 15% to 50% off. I plan to be there then maybe I can afford to get one for the Syncro and fix the drips!

SSG Brad Spear 1972 (SLOWLY getting together) Westfalia 1987 (drip...drip...drip) Syncro GL

Date: Fri, 01 Sep 1995 16:34:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com> From: "Maher, Steve (SD-MS)" <SMAHER@PO2.GI.COM> Subject: RE: 55mph/right-lane ethics

On 1 Sep 1995, Rusty VanBondo wrote:

>Steve Maher and others were discussing the "innaccurate" speedo from Tom >FFFFFs post: > >"But you have to wonder if this guy was as clueless as >he sounds, or was he indulging in a little bit of pompous >righteousness, trying to force other to declare how 'right' he >was... (by doing the speed limit vs keeping up with traffic)." ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Hey, Rusty... love ya dude, but please don't put words in my mouth. I didn't write that part in parens-- someone else added it after I posted the original message.

The "others" I referred to, were the mechanics whom he wanted to declare that his speedo was OK, and that the other drivers were (gasp) exceeding the limit.

This is more than enough to qualify him for the Jerkus Maximus list IMHO. But, as I implied earlier, if he does 55 IN THE RIGHTMOST LANE, I have no objection whatsoever to his driving habits. Left lane is a different story, as is his silly, self-important pomposity.

>I had to ride home from California to Phoenix with a fellow and his family >who for ethical reasonings drove 55.000000 MPH "because it was the law." >Yeah cool but 100's of miles from anywhere, literally on I-5 and I-10, I >woulda figgered he'd do like 58-62? No, 55 was "the law." Cool for ethics >and sh** but I wanted to get home. So did the millions of people that >screamed by us!

Ethics... hmmmm. Is it ethical to obey a blatantly ridiculous law? There are times when I need/want/feel-like/don't-give-a-sh*t-about driving 55 on interstates. Even wide-open ones in the middle of nowhere. Even if the laws were 70 (as most were when these roads were first built), 55 is still OK... PROVIDED YOU DO IT IN THE RIGHT LANE.

Face it, No matter what the limits are, some will go faster than others on the same road, whether it's 55 vs 75, or 70 vs. 90. A little courtesy (and intelligence) can make it workable. It usually does, in fact-- dweebs like the speedo guy are the noticeable exception.

I seldom go as slow as 55, even in the bus. But I habitually stay to the right, even when middle-lane traffic is slower than me, partly because if the guy in front of me speeds up, no way can I keep up. The situation changes quicker than my bus can respond-- guaranteeing that I _will_ be in peoples' way, no matter which lane I'm in, or how fast I was going beforehand. So, I stay in the right lane, where slowness and lack of acceleration is EXPECTED AND PROPER. Others can pass in all those left lanes. If they can't, then either that freeway is really jammed and they will have problems with ANYONE in the right lane; or they are immature A**holes who want the whole world, and can never be satisfied anyway.

Wanna go slow, get in the right lane, and I'm on your side 100%. Wanna go fast, get OUT of the right lane-- it's your responsibility too, all you dummkopfs out there who tailgate in the slow lane! YOU'RE the ones who are blowing it-- not the guy who at least TRIED to give you a clearer road.

>BTW:Arizona Revised Statutes specifies that the right lane is for entering >or exiting the thoroughfare, Middle lane is for getting there, and the far >left lane is for passing only.

Are you kidding me??? Geez... In Nazi Germany, they had a saying to the effect that "Everything that is not forbidden, is compulsory!" I THINK it was meant as a joke. But sometimes, you wonder...

>The "Phoenix turn signal" is a local expression for a quick glance >over your shoulder as you punch the throttle.

Obviously a local custom-- in SoCal, they never look before changing! :)

-Steve Maher smaher@ball.com '71 VW Transporter '66 Mustang Coupevertible


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.