Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 1995)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 09 Nov 1995 14:31:00 -0800 (PST)
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         "Maher, Steve (SD-MS)" <SMAHER@PO2.GI.COM>
Subject:      RE: Heater Ideas

>> > SET DEVICE=EXXON to screw up your environment. >> >> SET CAR=NODRIVE to stop screwing it up. >> Or else quit whining about it! Exxon et. al. only supplies YOUR demand! > >Hmmm... remember the Chevron Valdez? No, wait, it was the EXXON Valdez! >I have not set wheel in an Exxon station since then. Friendly serv or >not. Perhaps I'm punishing the wrong villain, perhaps not, but it makes >me feel better.

An easy trap to fall into, Dave. As I recall, there have been lotsa tanker spills over the years. I don't recall all the companies involved, besides Exxon at Pr. William Sound of course. But I'd be surprised if Exxon was the only one that ever spilled oil and messed up a shoreline. Wasn't there once a big spill (more than one?) off the Santa Barbara coast, involving a tanker, an oil platform, or a combination of the two?

The point I was trying to make, is that it's our huge demand for oil that created the supertankers, offshore wells, oil shale wells, etc. Pretending that any company(s) could supply this demand with zero spills, is unrealistic to say the least. We, the people who drive cars, get goods delivered by trucks & trains, turn on lights powered by oil-fired generating stations, and heat our homes with oil, have brought it upon ourselves.

Blaming Exxon, or any other oil company, is like blaming a match for starting a fire. Oil is bulky, messy, unpleasant stuff. Considering the huge traffic in oil, it's almost surprising that there are so FEW accidents with it. Out of the next 10,000 tanker voyages, I guarantee that there will be one with the captain passed out drunk in his cabin, despite the most stringent rules (and common sense) against it-- and despite the professionalism and dedication of the other 9999 captains. Or maybe even a captain will be suddenly taken ill at just the wrong time, and the ship will be in the hands of a less-experienced man who screws up a tricky avoidance maneuver and collides with another ship.

As long as we depend on oil, we are _guaranteeing_ ourselves oil spills. Which company pulled the latest one, is almost immaterial.

AND... I favor a dependence on oil! It's the safest, cleanest, most convenient energy source we have (except nuclear IMHO, but that's another argument). Our lives (and environment) would be a lot worse if we had never discovered oil anywhere, and had developed any other conventional energy source instead.

Well, sorry-- that got me going. I'll shut up now...

Steve


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.