Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 1996)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 16 Apr 1996 09:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         "Maher, Steve (SD-MS)" <SMAHER@gi.com>
Subject:      V6anagon un-V6'ed (continued) - LONG (sorry, Gerry)

With the engine and trans apart, the remains of the clutch look remarkably like the piece the PO had showed me when I first bought the V6anagon from him, after he installed the new clutch I sent him.

Several possible causes as I see it:

1.) Defective clutch from the factory? Very unlikely, since these are original German clutch parts (Sachs), and there seem to have been two very similar failures in a row.

Only spring-center clutches are available thru normal channels for the '80 Vanagon's stock 228-mm clutch and flywheel. Kennedy makes some solid-center clutch discs for racing use, but they're REAL solid-- don't even have the thin leaf springs between the linings of the disc, as all normal bug and bus clutches do, solid and spring center alike. Kennedy recommends against using them for street, which is all I use the V6anagon for. When you let the clutch pedal out, the clutch suddenly engages all the way, within only about 1/8" of pedal travel.

He did suggest one possible source for custom-made aftermarket solid-center clutches, which I may check out. But depending on other circumstances that may have led to this failure, I may be better off with a spring-center clutch disc. Read on:

2.) Engine-transmission misalignment? Possible. This would be an adapter problem if true. Ideally, the centerline of the crankshaft should exactly match the centerline of the trans input shaft. Actually, the trans is built with a slight wobble to its input shaft, so you can be a *little* off and still make it work.

But if you are too far off, then you'll get a slight angle between the input shaft and the flywheel, instead of the perfect right angle they should be to each other. This would make the clutch disc sit not quite flat on the flywheel; and when you let out the clutch pedal, the clutch will force the disc to sit flat on the flywheel, slightly flexing the center of the disc on the input shaft. Then when the engine and input turn together, the clutch center will flex once with every engine revolution. Can you say "metal fatigue"? I think this would toast a solid-center clutch even faster than it did these two spring-center clutches so far.

There are ways to measure for this, I think. Now that the flywheel is removed, I'll cut a stick to the exact distance from the surface of the crank, to the ridge machined in the adapter that seats the adapter into the (round) tranny opening. If this distance doesn't match for all 360 degrees around the crank, then BZZZZT...

3.) Dynamic imbalance of the flywheel? This one's a little more esoteric, though with this particular engine it may be possible. Most engines require a balanced flywheel, for obvious reasons. If the engine's balanced and the flywheel isn't, it'll shake the car apart... sort of as the V6anagon's been doing since I've had it. The PO even commented on this droning vibration before I bought it from him.

BUT... a very few engines are deliberately built unbalanced, and require a flywheel that's unbalanced in the opposite direction, to compensate. Yup, the Chevy 2.8L V6 is one of those few (the 4-cyl engine that also came in the citation isn't, by odd contrast).

When I removed the flywheel, which was made from a Vanagon flywheel, I was astonished to find fourteen drill holes evenly spaced along one side of the rim. Looked like some casting shop had done a REALLY bad job when they originally made it, and a lot of machining was required to balance it. But I stuck it on a dowel rod, and the undrilled side flopped right down to the bottom, time and again.

Called Kennedy, sure I had found the problem, and he told me about Chevy V6 balancing oddities. This extra drilling to deliberately "unbalance" a flywheel by a certain amount, is called match-balancing. I learn something new every day... usually right after my car breaks down.

But now I wonder... the VW flywheel is heavily dished, like a frisbee with a real thick rim. I wonder if the original Chevy flywheel for this engine, was this deeply dished. If not, then the metal that was removed on one side to properly match this VW flywheel to the (unbalanced) Chevy V6 engine, may have been removed from an area that was farther from the flat bolting surface of the crankshaft, than the Chevy flywheel would have been.

Now that you are all throughly confused, imagine a wheel on your car, perfectly balanced. Now put a 10-pound weight on the top of the rim, on the outside where everyone can see it. Then duck under the car and put an identical 10-pound weight on the bottom of the rim, on the inside where only your engine can see it.

If you jack up the wheel and set it to any rotational position, it will stay there, because it's still perfectly balanced. This is "static balancing". Rotationally, the two extra weights cancel each other out, even though the top one is 36" from the car's centerline and the bottom one is only 30" from the car's centerline.

But if you start spinning the wheel, it's a whole different story. In short, when the wheel spins fast, both those weights will try to go as far from the axle as they can. But a line drawn from one weight to the other, will NOT be at right angles to the axle, since one weight is on the outside of the wheel and the other is on the inside. The two weights will try to rock the wheel enough to make the line a right angle with the axle. Instant wheel shimmy!

This is why, when you have your tires balanced at Goodyear or wherever, they put the tire/wheel on a machine that spins them, before the mechanic puts on the little weights. He's looking for this kind o "dynamic imbalance", which he wouldn't see if he simply hung the wheel on a stationary balance point.

Well, coming back to the vibrating V6anagon...

The flywheel for the Chevy 2.8L V6, is required to be heavier on one side than the other ("statically unbalanced"), to make up for an opposite imbalance built into the engine. If the flywheel is perfectly flat, that's fine (I wonder if the original Chevy flywheel was flat?)

But if you set the VW flywheel on a table, with the center that bolts to the crankshaft resting on the table, then look where metal was removed to deliberately unbalance the flywheel. That part, is half an inch above the table. Seems a small difference, but at 4,000 rpm it can start to matter a lot. On the opposite rim, the heavier part of the flywheel, is also half an inch above the table.

This is a lot like taking ONE of those ten-pound weights, off your wheel. The other ten-pound weight, will still try to rock the wheel the same amount it was before. And I suspect that the heavy edge of the flywheel, is trying to rock the flywheel in the same way.

Since the Chevy 2.8L V6 engine requires an unbalanced flywheel, and the VW requires a dished flywheel, the two may never get along-- the vibration may be incurable.

Well, I'm going to see if the engine is properly centered on the adapter first-- at least that is curable, if it is. Then I'll ask Kennedy for a list of their customers who have put this particular engine into their Vanagons. Hope there's more than one name on the list! If I (or the PO) is the only one, then I'll ask for customers with other match-balanced engines and flywheels.

I may not get to do much more analysis on this beast-- the apartment security guards have been asking me what kind of tune-up requires the engine to be resting on the ground in the apt. parking lot as it is now. They're my buddies, so they're cutting me some slack, but I don't want to put them in too bad a position. But I must get the V6anagon back together by the end of the coming weekend. Maybe just have to rename it Shaky Jake?

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Maher smaher@gi.com '80 V6anagon w/Chevy 2800 '66 Mustang Coupevertible, for sale

Check out the cars at http://www.lookup.com/homepages/76242/home.html

*** It takes all kinds to make this world. That's why we aren't all Irish. *** ---------------------------------------------------------------------


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.