Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 1996)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 29 Apr 1996 14:26:00 -0400 (EDT)
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         Porter_Fred%PAX9@mr.nawcad.navy.mil
Subject:      Re: aerodynamics (Seriously...)

This post will provide lotsa opportunity for well deserved ribbing.......

While driving around the salty/muddy roads this winter, I noticed that the air tended to separate from the surface of the van near the area of the aft body panel seam, or the seam just infront of the cooling air intakes at the back of my vanagon. This was indicated by the wet body panels infront of the seam and behind the seam the surface of the van was dry. Why is this important? If my observations and hypothesis are correct, then the cross sectional area contributing to separated pressure drag is the cross sectional area outlined by the transition between wet to dry body panels. If the separation point could be moved rearward on the van, the cross sectional area for pressure drag would be reduced. By putting vortex generators near the transition line (experimentation would be required) the spearation point could be moved rearward, the cross sectional area reduced and drag decreased.

If you are unfamliar with vortex generators, look at the wing of an airplane next time you travel somewhere without driving your van. The little metal tabs sticking up on the wing at (usually) regularly spaced intervals at an angle to the airflow on the outboard leading edge or upstream of the flaps or ailerons are vortex generators.

This is similar to why golf balls are dimpled. If hit the same, a smooth golf ball will not travel as far as a dimpled golf ball. If this worked, the drag would be reduced (somewhat) and mpg increased.

Experimentally, the placement of the vortex generators (vg's) could be optimized for a driving speed by getting a bunch of the adhesive backed magnets and gluing the metal tabs to them. Before placing the vg's on the van surface, tape a grid of yarn tufts on the van surface and drive at your normal cruising speed with somebody in a vehicle beside you video taping the behavior of the tufts in the airflow. This will provide baseline data to judge the effect of the vg's when placed at different locations on the van. Then place the tabs in a line parallel to separation line. Do the driving/video taping thing again. By using the magnetic tabs, the location of the tabs will be easily changed without using paint damaging adhesives. Start the tests with the line of vg's in front of the separation line and repeat the test several times. Each time, incrementally move the line of vg's rearward. Additional experiments could/should be done with size, angle and spacing of the vg's (i'm not an aerodynamacist, so I can't provide guidance here, infact my whole theory may be flawed, but thot experiments are fun).

have fun poking fun, porter_fred%pax9@mr.nawcad.navy.mil relax and spin 87 syncro


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.