Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 1996)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 10 Apr 1996 10:12:30 -0500
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         Scott Morrow <smorrow@gbutler.com>
Subject:      RE: Big Engine Bozo's

At 07:09 PM 4/9/96 -0500, you wrote: > >>Friend Richard's 1600dp is almost dead. In just over a year its gone >>from fairly healthy to 1/2 the power of a 1100cc! :) >>So he is going to buy a new engine. Cost no object. He wants to >>be able to crush my 1776. > >Steve Maher wrote: >If you want more power, why not go with an engine designed for more power? >Kennedy makes adapters that can let you mount many different engines in >your VW-- Japanese, American, European; 4, 6, 8 cyl, rotary. Total cost >will be at or less than a properly built big-bore VW. You do have to >do some fabrication yourself, depending on engine. But you won't be >overstressing your engine and hoping it doesn't blow apart. > >Things are not completely rosy in these conversions: I'm currently >having a clutch/pilot bearing problem with my '80 Vanagon that has >a 2,8L Chevy V6 engine. Cause not yet known, but I suspect imbalance >and/or misalignment of the engine and tranny, and maybe the clutch. >(Or, it could be as simple as the PO forgetting to lube the pilot >bearing when he put it in.)

Being a big fan of MORE POWER, I think your "cost at no object" friend could build at least a 2007 or 2110 type I with no problem in the reliablity department. Keep the compression low for pump gas and flow the heads with some 44 webers and he will kick some asphalt!

I've built plenty of "reliable" street engines that were up in the 2.0 litre range with no problems so far. Even race a few of them.

I think with a engine conversion (gulp) I would think that there are alot of factors (like downtime, fabrication time, engine searching time, etc.) that most would not want to deal with.

I think that if Steve is happy with his V6 Vanagon, then that is great. I use to have a 140HP Corvair engine in my buggy. (gobs of power just ate up to many transmissions) so there are many factors envolved in the engine conversions that some people don't want to deal with or just can't deal with.

I have a buddy that uses Toyota engines in all of his buggys. He loves em and says he would never go back to VWs ever.

Hope this helps, see ya Scott Morrow Kansas City, MO 67 Chopped Drag Bug 74 412 Wagon Fiberglass Buggy smorrow@gbutler.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.