>I believe the design weakness in VW water jacketed motor installations >most commonly responsible for failures is their marginal heat rejection >system. Not only were heat rejection design errors common, but the gas >motors developed a fearsome reputation for being easily damaged by >over-heat conditions that other power plants would typically accept. >6) Oil cooling capacity from oil heated surfaces outside the engine are >too small and not optimally exposed to air flow. It's always better to >pull a btu from oil than the water based coolant. A loover sized heat >exchanger in the air dump? improve >oil heat radiation, or what ever occurs to you. > Thanks for listening and considering. > John Wakefield
I only want to address item 6. When you cool oil in your engine, you are cooling the oil and won't have much affect on engine temp at all. If you all feel otherwise, I really don't mind. I would also like to point out some numbers called coeffcient of heat transfer for various materials from Kents M E Handbook: Water transfers heat 7 times better than oil, Air tranfers heat 8 times better than water. By the way, what's an air dump? Is it like a bucket of prop-wash?
|
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.