Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 1996)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:28:37 -0300
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         edge@interramp.com
Subject:      Re: oil temp gauge

David Schwarze wrote: > > At 7:22 PM 6/21/96, James Cohen wrote: > >Gene Berg and Bill Fischer warn against the sump sender. It gives a false > >too cool reading. The dipstick is better. Just my 2cents. > > ..and to that I say, baloney! :-) > > Porsche mounted it in the sump (albeit with a different plate). If it's > good enough for Porsche, it's good enough for this bus owner. Besides > that, I think Berg and Fischer made a big boo-boo. Here's why I think > that. > > Did you know that the tip of the dipstick is less than an inch from where > the sender would be if it were mounted in the sump plate? It's true. If > you remove the sump plate and look up in there, you will see the tip of the > dipstick. It's right there ('72 - '82 air cooled type IV engines). > > The Porsche sump plate positions the sender a little higher in the case and > at an angle, when compared to the bus sump plate with a hole drilled in it. > When I installed the Porsche sump plate, I had to cut the bottom of my > dipstick off because it hit the sender. After that experience, I don't > think there is anything that could convince me that the dipstick sender is > any better. Plus, I don't like having wires dangling around in my engine > compartment. > > -David > > ============================================================================ > David Schwarze '73 VW Safare Custom Camper (Da Boat) > Dallas, Texas, USA '73 Capri GT 2800 (Da Beast) > e-mail: ddes@anet-dfw.com '87 Mustang Lx 5.0 (13.986@100.81) > http://www.anet-dfw.com/~ddes '93 Weber WG-50 (Da Piano) > ============================================================================ THANK YOU!, for finally presenting a valid argument on this subject! I always found it hard to beleive that the air would cool the sump any more than any other part of the engine. Besides, if that was the case, wouldn't the temp gauge almost immediatley jump up 20-30 degrees at idle after a long run on the highway? Mine don't!


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.