Date:         Fri, 7 Jun 1996 20:44:10 -0400 (EDT)
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         David Raistrick <xi8940@freenet.tlh.fl.us>
Subject:      Re: Ur-tools

hmm... well, since we speak bungee, i hate to state the obvious, BU i 
dont think that the American MegaCorp that tossed the "sport utility" 
vehichle off the bridge would have felt very secure it instead of bungee, 
it was attatched to the bridge with duct tape...hmm..i wonder...sport 
utility vehicle...a BUS, right? hmm..i think i need to find a bridge and 
a BIG bungee....that 74 of mine might not be good for much, but....

!.........................
                          The not so Keen one
       xi8940@freenet.fsu.edu                .........................!
   \\  //			http://www.armory.com/~y21cvb 
^\\ \XX/ //^  '68 Beetle	Links to a few pics of my VW's
  \\//\\//    '74 Super
   \/  \/     '75 Rusty Westy-Canadian Model

y21cvb@armory.com xi8940@freenet.fsu.edu lorn@armory.com jg8bt@cyberspace.org
chantry-raistrick@csra.net 76004.3235@compuserve.com




On Thu, 6 Jun 1996, William R. Kennedy, NJIT CIAT, 201-596-5648 wrote:

> Ron Van Ness sings the praises of bungee cords, but I think duct tape was
> created DAYS earlier in Genesis.  You can do lots of things with duct tape
> that you can't do with bungee cords, practically nothing with bungee cords
> that you can't do with duct tape.  Rear engine mounts are probably near the
> limit of duct tape's capability, but with three or four rolls, if they were
> fresh ...
> B.
> Wm Kennedy
> kennedy@admin.njit.edu
>