Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 23:10:16 -0600
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From: NTMail <root@sisna.com>
Subject: Warning - delayed mail
---------------------------------------------------------------------
***************************************
** This is a warning only **
** No action is required by you **
***************************************
Re: Message to felix@mail.sisna.com
Your message has not been delivered after 1 hours. Attempts to
deliver your message will continue for a further 2 hours. If it has
still not been delivered, it will be returned to you. The first few
lines of your message are repeated below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Your message follows:
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ga939464; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 21:04:34 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id za939223; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 21:01:28 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id la938403; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 20:53:40 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id va938049; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 20:49:35 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ha937307; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 20:43:06 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ka936218; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 20:33:19 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ra935367; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 20:23:29 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id na933751; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 20:03:24 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id wa933214; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 19:54:59 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ga930910; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 19:28:16 -0600
>Received: from [128.101.131.51] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ua929390; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 19:05:48 -0600
>Return-Path: <vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu>
>Received: from halfdan.med.umn.edu by mhub1.tc.umn.edu; Tue, 9 Jul 96 19:56:40 -0500
>Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 19:56:28 -0500
>Received: from (localhost) by halfdan; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 19:56:28 -0500
>Message-Id: <v01540b0cae08bbb9488d@[205.230.140.114]>
>Errors-To: gsker@lenti.med.umn.edu
>Reply-To: limbo@bcn.net
>Originator: vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu
>Sender: vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu
>Precedence: none
>From: limbo@bcn.net (Jim Digennaro)
>To: Multiple recipients of list <vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu>
>Subject: RE: Flywheel replacement
>X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
>X-Info: SISNA
>
>Aaron Britcher wrote:
>--- Fact is when the engine is turned off, the pistons usually come to rest
>all in the same position (roughly!) (ie- not at tdc or bdc) so when you
>fire it up, the starter grabs the flywheel in one of 2 positions- whack
>straight onto the
>ring gear. Now if you move the flywheel 90', as I have done on a couple
>of crap engines, you are effectively using a stronger and probably less
>starter wearing part of the flywheel.---
>
>** When I read this it got me thinking, he has a point. I had a 66 bus
>with a 1641cc engine and a degree wheel pulley. I used to noticed that
>when I turn off the engine it would come to rest a about the same point
>everytime. Same thing in my bug too. So whats my point? Well none
>really, just backing up Aaron's point about the starter hitting the
>flywheel at roughly the same points. Just my to marks worth. Take care.
>
> Keep on Busin' -Jim
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> LiMBO, The Late Model Bus Organization, international
>
>James Digennaro, LiMBO Treasurer, Merchandise sales and On-Line REP.
>20 First St
>Adams, MA 01220 '82 'GTI' Westfalia
>LiMBO LINE: (413) 743-1814
>E-mail: limbo@cn.net 'The Volkswagen Disc Jockey'
>URL: http://www.bcn.net/~limbo/
>
> 'Transporters By The Tunnel' A fun camping event, July 19th- 21st
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>.
|