Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 1996)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 15 Jul 1996 10:05:37 -0700
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         natasha!kombi@adobe.mv.us.adobe.com
Subject:      Re: Emissions laws (was: VW Customer Relations & reality check) slim VW

> So SyncroHead@aol.com says: > > > > The smog may not be gone and it may never be, but it's a LOT less smoggy than > > it used to be. > > I sure do hear differing stories on this. Now I'd be more inclined to believe > someone that lives there rather than one that doesn't. Do the rest of you that > live in the LA basin agree with Jim on this? > > Steven > Sacramento, CA > sjohnson@pcocd2.intel.com > > I used to commute between Huntington Beach and Long Beach in 1973. I remember quite distictly the *first* time I saw Signal Hill, I was amazed. I had been driving literally right by this landmark for weeks without being able to see it. We're talking visibilities in the under-a-half-mile range here, IFR weather for planes. It is much improved from the '70s (which was probably the worst point) but it seems to be deteriorating again, probably just because the city is bigger every year. Now I commute across the central valley, and that appears to be much worse now than it used to be, but the growth there is phenomenal (and the inversion-layer problems worse than the LA basin). The central valley is the "Big Valley" of old TV show fame, BTW, and holds such cities as Sacramento, Fresno, Bakersfield, Modesto and Stockton. I really believe that all of the smog laws work fine. We are not subject to the periodic inspections here -- only when you buy and sell cars. I have, however, a 1976 Toyota Landcruiser that I cannot sell. It runs fine, but had thermal reactor as original equipment. These are not available, and are all dead on all cars that had them, basically. I keep mine packed away, hoping it will pass one more inspection sometime. It is stupid beaurocracy that won't let me easily swap for a newer engine that passes more readily (it is possible to do this, just alot of hassle).

I drove a '57 until this year, but have no problem in running a waterboxer now. If anything, it is a better engine (IMO). If I ever build another old one, I'll certainly consider putting an early Vanagon engine into it, complete with the hall-effect distributor and FI. I only wish that VW had put the Jetronic injection on instead...

malcolm


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.