Date:         Tue, 9 Jul 1996 23:10:15 -0600
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         NTMail <root@sisna.com>
Subject:      Warning - delayed mail

---------------------------------------------------------------------

              ***************************************
              **       This is a warning only      **
              **    No action is required by you   **
              ***************************************

Re: Message to felix@mail.sisna.com

Your message  has not  been  delivered  after  1 hours.   Attempts to
deliver your message will continue for a further  2 hours.  If it has
still not been delivered,  it will be returned to you.  The first few
lines of your message are repeated below.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Your message follows:


>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ga939542; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 21:05:25 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id va939089; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 21:00:41 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ra938513; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 20:54:52 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id qa938200; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 20:50:55 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ba936859; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 20:39:47 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id za936129; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 20:32:19 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ua935474; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 20:24:37 -0600
>Received: from [128.101.131.51] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ka934346; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 20:09:32 -0600
>Return-Path: <vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu>
>Received: from halfdan.med.umn.edu by mhub1.tc.umn.edu; Tue, 9 Jul 96 21:00:17 -0500
>Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 20:59:27 -0500
>Received: from  (localhost) by halfdan; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 20:59:27 -0500
>Message-Id: <2BAE8D56954@smuslabs.smus.bc.ca>
>Errors-To: gsker@lenti.med.umn.edu
>Reply-To: sw@smus.bc.ca
>Originator: vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu
>Sender: vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu
>Precedence: none
>From: sw@smus.bc.ca
>To: Multiple recipients of list <vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu>
>Subject: Re: VW Customer Relations & reality check
>X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
>X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.30)
>X-Info: SISNA
>
>
>> If they think that the Jetta Trek thing is a good concept, why not a Westy
>> Trek?  Or better yet a Synchro Westy Trek!    
>Good point - I was at the dealer a while back around the time we were 
>shopping for mtn bikes - the Jetta Trek came in at $17900 CDN, which 
>seemed like a great deal, since many of the other Jettas loaded up 
>were well over $20K (the VR6 is about $30k). I would never buy a new 
>car again, but I was surprised at the good value in this package, 
>comparitively anyway.
>
>A Westy Trek is a natural - around here a bus *without* a bike rack is 
>a rare sight...
>The Trek idea is a step in the right direction, but could be easily 
>copied by H*nda or anyone else. Now let's see someone copy a Westy 
>Syncro Trek... 
>
><dream mode=off>
>
>;)
>==============================
>Shawn Wright, sw@smus.bc.ca
>'85 Jetta TD, 348k (Jenni)
>'88 Westy, 331k (Kyra)
>==============================
>.