Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 1996)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 10 May 1996 03:53:52 -0700
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         jwakefield@4dmg.net (john wakefield)
Subject:      Affectionate diminutive formation (F?)

Before the Westfalia owners and those finding them interesting are divided into air and water, let me fire your collected neural cells. As I understand, the VW Westfalia has it's origins in a sector of Germany bearing the name Westfalia. In reasonable pride and understandable hope, when VW elected to export them into the US market, the Westfalia name was attached to it as a model designation. At first West jumps out at the uninitiated, and smart advice of a former age, "Go West young man" and thoughts of how "cool" far-west California was, give it a fine start as a marketing name. But Westfalia drags on for too many sylables. Worse, it's easily mispronounced to phonetically seem to contain the english word fail. By the time you have to explain that this isn't right, the incorrect association has only been reinforced, a self defeating process. I've heard people integrate the word hatchew or similar style into their noise made in sneezing. It's silly of course, but I imagine a Japaneese warior attempting to integrate four traditional sylables into his manly sneeze. It would be a stretch. Four sylables is just too long for a familiar common reference. Like children so named, the names beg to be shortened. And here's where the affectionate diminutive comes to our attention. Single sylables are potentially too short for good communication. Said alone and quickly, they can be confusing. By the time someone notices that you've said something, you've stoped talking and they aren't sure they know just what you did say. Besides, the concept of sylables is useful but shouldn't be pressed too far. Phonetically take the names Jay and Jake. Jake takes about twice as long. Still, they're both one sylable. But two sylables make nicely functioning names. Westfalia recognizably and pleasingly shortens to Westie or should it be Westy? It seems to me that many of this affectionate diminutive's users and opinion leaders of others who may use it are right on this list. As Lewis Carrol so well explained, words mean what we decide they mean, and may I add, are spelled as we decide they are to be spelled. It's curious that a spelling disabled person like me should find this interesting, but for the moment, I do. I think of my Westfalia to be either neuter or, like a ship, feminine. And because of that, I've decided I favor Westie over Westy. I know that as an unusually complex vehicle, it's more subject to having its component parts need attention. So to engendering the warmest most positive feelings toward it, should, I think, be a goal. So the one that is most easily and naturally associated with affectionate and forgiving feelings, should be adopted. For me, that's Westie rather than Westy, even though I'm strongly attracted to the apparent efficiencey improvement in one less letter. But on balance, I propose that this phonetic affectionate diminutive be spelled Westie.

Respectfully submitted, John Wakefield


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.